oppn parties Farmer's Unions: Incomprehensible Stubbornness

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Farmer's Unions: Incomprehensible Stubbornness

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-01-22 02:46:00

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

It is unfortunate that the farmer's unions have rejected the government offer of suspending the new farm laws for 18 months and let a joint committee of government and farmer's representatives find a solution in that time through discussions and negotiations. One had thought that better sense would prevail and the farmer's would treat this offer as a climb down by the government and a victory for them and grab it. But it seems that the farmers have become infatuated with their protest movement and their advisors are misleading them.

The farmers have to realize that for the last several decades, farming in India, especially in Punjab and Haryana, is being done for crops that are in oversupply status. Wheat and rice are rotting in government warehouses as there is a glut. Especially in Punjab, the sowing of the rice crop depletes ground water and does not make sense in a water-deficient state. Further, the farmers indulge in stubble burning to get the land ready for sowing. This is being done just to sell these products in the mandis at MSP. On the other hand, pulses, fruits, flowers and edible oils are being imported. A stop has to be put to this MSP-oriented and unwanted farming.

Reforms are necessary in agriculture sector to make India truly self sufficient in crops and not only in food grains. If the farmers were to shift to farming crops that are needed by the nation, they will be serving the cause better. Crops amenable to value addition will fetch better returns too. It will be better on economic grounds (for example, import substitution by growing oil seeds for increased manufacture of edible oils in India) and the environment will be less harmed if the farmers make this shift.

Hence, instead of being against reforms per se (which their refusal to even discuss the new farm laws and keep insisting on their repeal proves), the farmers should be reasonable and change their inflexible attitude. They should form a team of experts, join the proposed joint committee and discuss reforms. Thereafter, they should allow the government to enact farm laws that take their interests into account. It has been reported that 15 unions are willing to accept the latest government proposals and move ahead but 17 other unions are totally against it. Is there any point in continuing with the negotiations if the unions keep displaying this stubbornness?