oppn parties If A Crime Is "Rarest of Rare", As Per Law Death Sentence Must Be Imposed

News Snippets

  • Sikh extremists attacked a cinema hall in London that was playing Kangana Ranaut's controversial film 'Emergency'
  • A Delhi court directed the investigating agencies to senstize officers to collect nail clippings, fingernail scrappings or finger swab in order to get DNA profile as direct evidence of sexual attack is often not present and might result in an offender going scot free
  • Uniform Civil Code rules cleared by state cabinet, likely to be implemented in the next 10 days
  • Supreme Court reiterates that there is no point in arresting the accused after the chargesheet has been filed and the investigation is complete
  • Kolkata court sentences Sanjoy Roy, the sole accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case, to life term. West Bengal government and CBI to appeal in HC for the death penalty
  • Supreme Court stays criminal defamation case against Rahul Gandhi for his remarks against home minister Amit Shah in Jharkhand during the AICC plenary session
  • Government reviews import basket to align it with the policies of the Trump administration
  • NCLT orders liquidation of GoAir airlines
  • Archery - Indian archers bagged 2 silver in Nimes Archery tournament in France
  • Stocks make impressive gain on Monday - Sensex adds 454 points to 77073 and Nifty 141 points to 23344
  • D Gukesh draws with Fabiano Caruana in the Tata Steel chess tournament in the Netherlands
  • Women's U-19 T20 WC - In a stunning game, debutants Nigeria beat New Zealand by 2 runs
  • Rohit Sharma to play under Ajinkye Rahane in Mumbai's Ranji match against J&K
  • Virat Kohli to play in Delhi's last group Ranji trophy match against Saurashtra. This will be his first Ranji match in 12 years
  • The toll in the Rajouri mystery illness case rose to 17 even as the Centre sent a team to study the situation
Calling the case not 'rarest of rare', a court in Kolkata sentenced Sanjay Roy, the only accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case to life in prison until death
oppn parties
If A Crime Is "Rarest of Rare", As Per Law Death Sentence Must Be Imposed

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-05-24 08:00:07

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

In a bid to gradually do away with the death penalty, the Supreme Court had, in the Bachan Singh case in 1980, decreed that it should be given only in "the rarest of rare" cases. The enormity and nature of the crime and the manner in which it was conducted must be such as to shock the sensibilities for the criminal to be sentenced to death. To further reduce the need to impose capital punishment, the Supreme Court on Monday said that courts must, along with the enormity and nature of the crime, also consider the mental state and conduct of the convict before and after the crime in order to judge whether it is fit to impose the death penalty. While this is a good advice, it is debatable whether the court should have applied it in this particular case in commuting the death sentences of two men and one woman to 25 years in jail for murdering three generations of women of one family in Indore in 2011.

While it is accepted that law and society cannot act with the motive of revenge and the law should be used to reform and rehabilitate the criminal, in the instant case the Supreme Court has itself admitted that the crime was "extremely brutal, grotesque, diabolical, revolting or dastardly" and the manner of execution was also "vicious and pitiless". Doesn't that make it a "rarest of rare" case? The criminals committed the crime in their full senses, with planning and showed no remorse. That they allegedly reformed in jail through various activities - one man becoming the captain of the jail cricket team and starting to take interest in his family, another becoming a voluntary health worker and the woman excelling in embroidery work - should not have been enough reason to lessen the punishment, given the enormity of the crime.

The court said that psychiatric evaluation of the accused is must and the state must produce material disclosing psychiatric and psychological evaluation of the accused at the trail stage to help judges decide if there were mitigating factors. That could be taken into account to consider if a person was in a highly disturbed state of mind and not in his or her senses when he or she committed the crime. But in the instant case, three persons had colluded to commit the most gruesome of murders. Not all of them could have been in a disturbed state of mind. They knew what they were doing and that it was illegal and beastly. Still they heartlessly killed the three women. This was a fit case for death penalty, as per law and as per the earlier directions of the apex court.