oppn parties Is CBI Hoping That Sisodia Will Incriminate Himself?

News Snippets

  • Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, referring to a spate of FIRs for putting up posters in Delhi which said "Modi Hatao, Desh Bachao", said that even the British did not act in such manner
  • The 2023-24 Appropriation BIll, which allows the government to spend Rs 45 lakh crore in the fiscal, was passed by Lok Sabha in 9 minutes without any discussion
  • Sources say that Amritpal Singh fled to Haryana and may now be in Uttarakhand
  • Experts say that Rahul Gandhi's disqualification from Parliament will kick in immediately as the conviction has not been stayed
  • Tatas to invest $2bn in super app Tata Neu
  • Chief Economic Advisor V Anantha Nageswaran has said that inflation will drop as commodity and food prices have fallen
  • Government will define quality norms to ensure better 5G service
  • Stocks tumble again on Thursday after two sessions of recovery: Sensex loses 289 points to 57925 and Nifty goes down by 75 points to 17076
  • Amicus curiae and senior advocate K V Vishwanathan has told the Supreme Court that the changes made in law and three extensions given to the present director of Enforcement Directorate are illegal and will imperil the integrity of the agency
  • Supreme Court says it cannot judicially direct the government to acquire land or buildings near the court for advocates' chambers
  • ISSF Cup shooting: Indian pair of Rhythm Sangwan and Varun Tomar win silver in 10m sir rifle mixed team event
  • WPL: UP Warriorz take on Mumbai Indians in the Eliminator today. The winner will play Delhi Capitals in the finals
  • World Boxing: Four Indians - Nikhat Zareen, Nitu Ghanghas, Lovelina Borgohain and Saweety Boora - enter the frinals in their respective category
  • Bombay HC imposes costs and dismisses a petition by a housing society that sought to have a community-wise cap on residents
  • Delhi Police files 159 FIRs for defacement of public property and 49 for posters saying 'Modi Hatao Desh Bachao'
Rahul Gandhi disqualified from Parliament, Wayanad Lok Sabha seat declared vacant
oppn parties
Is CBI Hoping That Sisodia Will Incriminate Himself?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2023-03-04 14:56:05

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The Rouse Avenue court in Delhi today extended the CBI custody of former deputy chief minister of Delhi Manish Sisodia by two days despite Sisodia's lawyers arguing that all inquiries in the case have been completed and Sisodia cannot be kept in custody due to the agency's 'inefficiency'. When the remand was extended by the court, Sisodia complained that CBI officials were asking the same questions again and again and it was causing him mental harassment. The court then directed the CBI to refrain from asking same questions repeatedly.

The agency says that Sisodia is giving evasive answers even when they are confronting him with evidence. But that is par for the course as no one can be forced to be a witness against oneself. The right against self-incrimination is guaranteed by Article 20(3) of the Indian constitution. Hence, the CBI is wrong to say Sisodia is being evasive. He is within his rights not to confirm or deny the alleged proof or evidence that the CBI claims to have confronted him with. If the agency has the proof as it claims, it should present the same in court when the case comes up for hearing. But repeatedly asking the same questions and causing mental harassment to the detainee in the hope that he self-incriminates himself is against due process. In any case even if the agency, by mental or physical pressure (which it cannot do in case of a person like Sisodia), gets the detainee to 'confess', such 'confession' will have no meaning if the detainee denies it in court.

Hence, the CBI must refrain from applying pressure and should not demand further custody. If it has the evidence, it must nail Sisodia in court. It will be upon the judge to decide whether Sisodia is guilty as charged beyond reasonable doubt on the basis of the evidence presented by the agency. But as of now, there is no point in holding him in custody for just asking the same questions again and again.