oppn parties Is DRS Fast Becoming DRRS?

News Snippets

  • Crude prices fall sharply as Saudi Arabia assures normal production in a few weeks. Prices fall by 5.4% to $65.30 per barrel
  • Sensex tumbles 700 points over fears that rising crude prices will deal a body blow to the tottering Indian economy
  • As Rajeev Kumar fails to appear before the CBI despite several notices, the agency forms a special team to locate and apprehend him
  • S Jaishankar says Pakistan is not a normal neighbour and its behaviour is a "set of aberrations"
  • External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar says PoK in Indian territory and the country hopes to have physical jurisdiction over it one day
  • Barasat Sessions court near Kolkata rejects Rajeev Kumar anticipatory bail application citing lack of jurisdiction as the reason
  • PM Modi celebrates his birthday with Narmada aarti and later has lunch with his mother.
  • All 6 Bahujan Samaj Party MLAs merge with the Congress in Rajasthan
  • Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee to meet PM Modi on Wednesday, state issues on the agenda
  • Pakistan to open Kartarpur corridor on Nov 9
  • Rajeev Kumar, ex-police commissioner of Kolkata and wanted for questioning in the Sarada scam does not appear before the CBI despite the state administration requesting him to do so
  • Supreme Court asks the Centre to restore normalcy in J&K but keeping national interest in mind
  • As Trump accepts the invitation to attend a programme in Houston with PM Modi, India rushes to settle trade issues with US
  • After drone attack on Aramco's Suadi Arabia facility, oil prices jump 19% in intra-day trading causing worries for India
  • Imran Khan raises nuclear war bogey again, says if Pakistan loses a conventional war, it might fight till the end with its nuclear arsenal
Sunni Wakf Board and Nirvani Akhara write to the Supreme Court for a negotiated settlement to the Ayodhya dispute
oppn parties
Is DRS Fast Becoming DRRS?

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
The DRS or the Decision Review System is fast degenerating into DRRS or the Dressing Room Review System. First it was Steve Smith, the Australian captain, who had a “brain fade” (how convenient!) and looked towards the dressing room to see whether a DRS could be taken. Now, it was Dilruwan Perera of Sri Lanka who looked towards the dressing room and the guys there blatantly signaled him to take the DRS. Perera even acknowledged their help with a shake of the head. Then he staged a little act, went to the crease and immediately signaled to the field umpire that he wanted the decision to be reviewed. All this was recorded on tape and the commentators spent a good time discussing this. Some people are not playing the game in the right spirit.

Any action of on-field players that breaks cricketing laws is illegal. In plain English, it is called cheating. Maybe if you are from a sophisticated English-speaking background, you might get away with calling it a “brain fade.” But what excuse will Perera or the Sri Lankan dressing room make? I think that the ICC made a huge mistake in letting Steve Smith walk away without any penalty in the “brain fade” incident. It has emboldened the likes of Perera as they feel they too will not be penalized. Hence, if it is established that a player looked towards the dressing room and got a signal from there after which he asked, or did not ask, for DRS, then the player and the team captain should be fined 100 percent of their match fees. Additionally, the player should be banned for a minimum of three international matches.

The above penalty will seem very harsh to some. Before thinking so, it must be kept in mind that the DRS was devised as a tool to aid both the playing sides to take advantage of technology and get a review of the field umpires’ decision by the third umpire who has the benefit of television replays, nick-o-meter and other mapping aids. But the doubt in the mind must come to the player or players involved in on-field action as they have just the real-time view like the field umpires. The dressing room guys have the benefit of having watched the television replays. Hence, if they signal to the on-field player, it is cheating. Since one reversed decision can change the course of the match, the penalty must be commensurate with the action. Unless the ICC takes a strong exception and starts penalizing players for seeking dressing room nod for DRS, the whole system will become a sham and may even collapse.