oppn parties Is DRS Fast Becoming DRRS?

News Snippets

  • Former Pakistani cricketer Shoaib Akhtar proposes an Indo-Pak ODI series to raise funds for fighting coronavirus
  • Maharashtra government says many Tablighi Jamaat members who attended the Markaz and returned have gone into hiding
  • West Bengal government identifies hotspots in Kolkata and the rest of the state, inclined to extend the lockdown in those places only
  • Prime Minister Modi holds a video conference with floor leaders of opposition parties, hints at extending the lockdown
  • UP seals hotspots and makes masks mandatory
  • Masks made compulsory in Mumbai, violators will be arrested
  • ICMR says an infected person can infect 406 people in 30 days without social distancing and lockdown
  • Stock markets make a smart recovery. Sensex up by record 2476 points on global cues
  • Schools, colleges and shopping malls likely to remain closed for a further period of one month, says empowered group of ministers
  • PM Modi tells BJP workers that India is in for a long battle against the coronavirus and there is no scope to feel tired or defeated
  • PM Modi asks ministers to focus on exports and new areas and sectors
  • PM Modi asks ministers to prepare business continuity plan post the lifting of the lockdown
  • Corona cases in India cross 4000 and the death toll stands at 124
  • The government decides to double the testing of corona suspects from 10000 now to 20000 in the next three days
  • Flipkart assures employees that there will be no job or salary cuts due to the COVID-19 pandemic
COVID-19: 773 new cases and 32 deaths in the last 24 hours, reports the health ministry
oppn parties
Is DRS Fast Becoming DRRS?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2017-11-19 19:23:03

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
The DRS or the Decision Review System is fast degenerating into DRRS or the Dressing Room Review System. First it was Steve Smith, the Australian captain, who had a “brain fade” (how convenient!) and looked towards the dressing room to see whether a DRS could be taken. Now, it was Dilruwan Perera of Sri Lanka who looked towards the dressing room and the guys there blatantly signaled him to take the DRS. Perera even acknowledged their help with a shake of the head. Then he staged a little act, went to the crease and immediately signaled to the field umpire that he wanted the decision to be reviewed. All this was recorded on tape and the commentators spent a good time discussing this. Some people are not playing the game in the right spirit.

Any action of on-field players that breaks cricketing laws is illegal. In plain English, it is called cheating. Maybe if you are from a sophisticated English-speaking background, you might get away with calling it a “brain fade.” But what excuse will Perera or the Sri Lankan dressing room make? I think that the ICC made a huge mistake in letting Steve Smith walk away without any penalty in the “brain fade” incident. It has emboldened the likes of Perera as they feel they too will not be penalized. Hence, if it is established that a player looked towards the dressing room and got a signal from there after which he asked, or did not ask, for DRS, then the player and the team captain should be fined 100 percent of their match fees. Additionally, the player should be banned for a minimum of three international matches.

The above penalty will seem very harsh to some. Before thinking so, it must be kept in mind that the DRS was devised as a tool to aid both the playing sides to take advantage of technology and get a review of the field umpires’ decision by the third umpire who has the benefit of television replays, nick-o-meter and other mapping aids. But the doubt in the mind must come to the player or players involved in on-field action as they have just the real-time view like the field umpires. The dressing room guys have the benefit of having watched the television replays. Hence, if they signal to the on-field player, it is cheating. Since one reversed decision can change the course of the match, the penalty must be commensurate with the action. Unless the ICC takes a strong exception and starts penalizing players for seeking dressing room nod for DRS, the whole system will become a sham and may even collapse.