oppn parties Is It Fair For A Sit-In Diner To Levy Service Charge?

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Is It Fair For A Sit-In Diner To Levy Service Charge?

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2022-07-07 08:39:01

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

 The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has barred restaurants and hotels from adding service charge by default and advised consumers to pay the charge if they wanted to or ask the establishment to remove it from the bill, failing which they could lodge a complaint with the Consumer Commission against the 'unfair trade practice'.

But is it an 'unfair trade practice'? The National Restaurants Association of India (NRAI) does not think so. In a rebuttal, the NRAI has said that there is no legal basis for the CCPA advisory and "service charge is a part of owner's discretion/decision regarding the total price payable by a customer with regards to the sale or service of a product." It has further said that "neither the government nor any authority can interfere with the decision of the business owner in this respect. It is a universally accepted trade practice."

So who is correct? While there is no doubt that a business owner is within his or her rights to levy additional charges in making up the total bill for a sale or a service or a sale combined with service, there has to be transparency in doing so. Most restaurants that levy service charges inform it as a small print in the menu. This means that while the customer scans the prices on the menu and has in mind how much he or she will have to pay, they are shocked to find anywhere between 10 to 15% added to the bill for service charge. Hence, a food bill of, say, Rs 5000 comes to Rs 5750. Further, when one goes to a sit-in restaurant, one expects table service given the fancy prices of items on the menu. If one goes by the logic of the NRAI, they can next include 'cooking charges' or 'table charges' as an additional item in the bill. Logically, the prices on the menu of a sit-in dining facility should reflect all cost inputs including establishment and service charges for reasons of transparency. Extras, except government taxes, should not be charged.