oppn parties Is The Judiciary Stepping In Executive Domain?

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Is The Judiciary Stepping In Executive Domain?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-11-24 05:56:50

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The tug of war in the Supreme Court, with the 5-judge bench making several pertinent observations regarding the continued assault on the independence of the Election Commission as, in its view, the appointment process of election commissioners was not transparent and the government arguing that the appointment was the exclusive preserve of the executive, basically stems from the fact that political parties in India have never displayed the will to go for much needed electoral reforms. Since the courts have had to step in to trigger the introduction of such basic reforms as to ensure that criminal records of all candidates, the list of their assets and educational qualifications were published and those with convicted of a crime that carries a punishment of two years' (or even less in some cases) of imprisonment were disqualified to contest elections, it is clear that politicians by themselves would not like to change the status quo.

It is in this respect that the Supreme Court, hearing a bunch of pleas on the process of appointing election commissioners, has sought to intervene and find out if the government is acting against the Constitution in such appointments. The judges have opined that successive governments have used the "silence of the Constitution" on this issue to abrogate exclusive power. Although the Election Commission, a statutory body that is independent for all practical purposes, has been doing exemplary work in conducting the world's largest elections and is largely seen to be free of bias, the point which the bench has raised cannot be ignored. The process of appointing election commissioners needs to be much more transparent that it is now.

But for that, judicial intervention in the form of the chief justice of India sitting on the selection committee is not needed. As per separation of powers, even though the Constitution is silent on this issue, the executive must have the right of such appointments. The only need is to streamline the process through consultations between all political parties and, if needed, the enactment of a separate law. The government must not play favourites and it must be on paper how the election commissioners will be selected. For, when it comes to the crunch, if the election commissioners know they have been appointed as per law as they were the most eligible, they will not be beholden to the powers-that-be and could carry out their duties fearlessly and in a fair manner.