oppn parties Is There No Conflict Of Interest In Courts Deciding On Contempt?

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
Is There No Conflict Of Interest In Courts Deciding On Contempt?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-08-20 12:46:43

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Prasant Bhushan has asked the Supreme Court to defer the sentencing in the contempt case against him in which he was held guilty. He has said that he will be filing a review petition against the order. Meanwhile, several prominent citizens, including more than 700 lawyers from all over India, have supported the court for holding Bhushan guilty. Going against the tide of editorials critical of the Supreme Court order, the Free Press Journal (FPJ) has applauded the court for taking a stand against those who have made it a habit to malign the judiciary.

There are two things that need to be considered in the whole episode. The first is the tendency of some people to try and browbeat the court into accepting their point of view and being biased and personal in their criticism if it is not accepted. There is obviously an urgent need to stop this. The second is the conflict of interest in having the Supreme Court decide what comes under contempt and how the alleged offender is to be punished. There is also an urgent need to work out a separate mechanism for this.

As the FPJ editorial had stressed, Bhushan has made an industry out of filing PILs and is so full of himself that he can never accept decisions that go against him. He has also made it a habit of launching personal attacks on the court and individual judges. When was the last time Bhushan offered a reasoned critique of a Supreme Court judgment? His criticisms often adopt a malicious stance and smack of personal attacks. In that sense, it is not totally incorrect to punish him. This writer had previously written that habitual offenders should never be spared.

But it is not the punishment of Bhushan that others are protesting against. It is the way the Supreme Court takes up contempt cases and decides the guilt and punishment. In the BCCI case, the court had made much of conflict of interest and had said no one can sit on judgment in his/her own case as it went against the principles of natural justice. Then how can the court sit in judgment in contempt cases? Does it not become the judge, jury and executioner in such cases? Should we not have an independent authority, like perhaps the Lok Pal, to decide on contempt cases?