oppn parties Justice Chanda Of Calcutta HC Exits From The Nandigram Poll Result Case

News Snippets

  • The Indian envoy in Bangladesh was summoned by the country's government over the breach in the Bangladesh mission in Agartala
  • Bank account to soon have 4 nominees each
  • TMC and SP stayed away from the INDIA bloc protest over the Adani issue in the Lok Sabha
  • Delhi HC stops the police from arresting Nadeem Khan over a viral video which the police claimed promoted 'enmity'. Court says 'India's harmony not so fragile'
  • Trafiksol asked to refund IPO money by Sebi on account of alleged fraud
  • Re goes down to 84.76 against the USD but ends flat after RBI intervenes
  • Sin goods like tobacco, cigarettes and soft drinks likely to face 35% GST in the post-compensation cess era
  • Bank credit growth slows to 11% (20.6% last year) with retail oans also showing a slowdown
  • Stock markets continue their winning streak on Tuesday: Sensex jumps 597 points to 80845 and Nifty gains 181 points to 24457
  • Asian junior hockey: Defending champions India enter the finals by beating Malaysia 3-1, to play Pakistan for the title
  • Chess World title match: Ding Liren salvages a sraw in the 7th game which he almost lost
  • Experts speculate whether Ding Liren wants the world title match against D Gukesh to go into tie-break after he let off Gukesh easily in the 5th game
  • Tata Memorial Hospital and AIIMS have severely criticized former cricketer and Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu for claiming that his wife fought back cancer with home remedies like haldi, garlic and neem. The hospitals warned the public for not going for such unproven remedies and not delaying treatment as it could prove fatal
  • 3 persons died and scores of policemen wer injured when a survey of a mosque in Sambhal near Bareilly in UP turned violent
  • Bangladesh to review power pacts with Indian companies, including those of the Adani group
D Gukesh is the new chess world champion at 18, the first teen to wear the crown. Capitalizes on an error by Ding Liren to snatch the crown by winning the final game g
oppn parties
Justice Chanda Of Calcutta HC Exits From The Nandigram Poll Result Case

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-07-07 14:02:55

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

Although Justice Kaushik Chanda of the Calcutta High Court has exited from the case chief minister Mamata Banerjee had filed challenging her electoral loss in Nadigram to BJP's Suvendhu Adhikari, he termed the chief minister's action of writing to the CJ asking for his removal for "conflict of interest" a "preplanned move to malign a judge" and imposed a Rs 5 lakh fine on her. The TMC has also alleged that Justice Chanda was previously involved with the BJP.

But one thing which Justice Chanda said and which is very pertinent to the present demand of removing a judge from the case was when he questioned the chief minister's logic that he could be biased against her as she had objected to his confirmation as a permanent judge of the Calcutta HC. Justice Chanda said that if that yardstick was to be applied, no judge of the Calcutta HC would be fit enough to hear the case as she must have "either objected to or confirmed the appointment" of all judges.

It is clear that if someone can fear bias against self for having objected to an appointment, it can also be said that if a judge who was recommended or approved for posting hears the case, he or she might favour the person. If bias is important, then favour is also equally important and the same yardstick has to be applied.

Conflict of interest is a serious matter. But lately, it is being used in a cavalier manner. Also the matter of asking judges to exit cases for this or that reason is getting out of hand. When the CJ of a High Court assigns a case, normally there should not be any objection unless the conflict is serious or a point of law is involved. Judges perform their duty according to law as per materials placed before them. If there is any bias in the judgment, it is open to the petitioner to go for an appeal. But aspersions should not be cast on judges even before they hear cases and pronounce judgments as it amounts to putting pressure on the judiciary.