oppn parties Law Versus Faith, Tradition and Custom

News Snippets

  • The home ministry has notified 50% constable-level jobs in BSF for direct recruitment for ex-Agniveers
  • Supreme Court said that if an accused or even a convict obtains a NOC from the concerned court with the rider that permission would be needed to go abroad, the government cannot obstruct renewal of their passport
  • Supreme Court said that criminal record and gravity of offence play a big part in bail decisions while quashing the bail of 5 habitual offenders
  • PM Modi visits Bengal, fails to holds a rally in Matua heartland of Nadia after dense fog prevents landing of his helicopter but addresses the crowd virtually from Kolkata aiprort
  • Government firm on sim-linking for web access to messaging apps, but may increase the auto logout time from 6 hours to 12-18 hours
  • Mizoram-New Delhi Rajdhani Express hits an elephant herd in Assam, killing seven elephants including four calves
  • Indian women take on Sri Lanka is the first match of the T20 series at Visakhapatnam today
  • U19 Asia Cup: India take on Pakistan today for the crown
  • In a surprisng move, the selectors dropped Shubman Gill from the T20 World Cup squad and made Axar Patel the vice-captain. Jitesh Sharma was also dropped to make way for Ishan Kishan as he was performing well and Rinku Singh earned a spot for his finishing abilities
  • Opposition parties, chiefly the Congress and TMC, say that changing the name of the rural employment guarantee scheme is an insult to the memory of Mahatma Gandhi
  • Commerce secreatary Rajesh Agarwal said that the latest data shows that exporters are diversifying
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said that if India were a 'dead economy' as claimed by opposition parties, India's rating would not have been upgraded
  • The Insurance Bill, to be tabled in Parliament, will give more teeth to the regulator and allow 100% FDI
  • Nitin Nabin took charge as the national working president of the BJP
  • Division in opposition ranks as J&K chief minister Omar Abdullah distances the INDIA bloc from vote chori and SIR pitch of the Congress
U19 World Cup - Pakistan thrash India by 192 runs ////// Shubman Gill dropped from T20 World Cup squad, Axar Patel replaces him as vice-captain
oppn parties
Law Versus Faith, Tradition and Custom

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-10-29 12:22:56

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
BJP President Amit Shah is doing the wrong thing by encouraging the so-called devotees at Sabarimala to break the law and not allow the Kerala government to implement the Supreme Court order allowing entry of females aged between 10 to 50 years inside the sanctum sanctorum of the temple. He is of the opinion that courts should “respect” people’s “faith” and not give orders that cannot be “implemented”. His “rock solid support” for something illegal (as the stopping of women is after the SC order) displays a high degree of arrogance and a complete disrespect for the judiciary and rule of law.

Actually, there are no court orders that cannot be implemented. For politicians, there are only two kinds of court orders – one that is in their favour or to their liking and the other that goes against them or is not to their liking. They will become profuse in ‘respecting’ the judiciary once the order is in their favour and will move heaven and earth to implement it. But if the order is against them or lot to their liking, they will criticize the judiciary and cite law and order problems to say that the order cannot be implemented.

The Supreme Court has time and again reiterated that if the tradition, custom or faith of any religion clashes with the rights granted to the individual under the Constitution or any act in force, courts will always rule by interpreting the law and not give primacy to the religious practices. The courts have given several orders, including allowing women in Hazi Ali dargah and the practice of triple talaq, which went against tradition or faith but upheld the rights of the individual as enshrined in the Constitution. At that time, the government called it progressive. How then is Sabarimala different?

Amit Shah is playing a dangerous game for getting a foothold in Kerala. He is enticing Hindutva activists to actively oppose the SC orders and create problems for the Left-front government. He is shredding the fabric of social peace and harmony for short-term political gains. If he thinks that Sabarimala can be developed into another tool to consolidate Hindu votes he is sadly mistaken. For, women devotees driven by faith may voluntarily decide not to enter the temple. But if they are stopped by force, then the BJP risks losing the votes of women across the country as it will be seen as forced gender discrimination by Hindutva elements.