oppn parties Madras HC's Unusual Ruling In A Medical Negligence Case

News Snippets

  • Sikh extremists attacked a cinema hall in London that was playing Kangana Ranaut's controversial film 'Emergency'
  • A Delhi court directed the investigating agencies to senstize officers to collect nail clippings, fingernail scrappings or finger swab in order to get DNA profile as direct evidence of sexual attack is often not present and might result in an offender going scot free
  • Uniform Civil Code rules cleared by state cabinet, likely to be implemented in the next 10 days
  • Supreme Court reiterates that there is no point in arresting the accused after the chargesheet has been filed and the investigation is complete
  • Kolkata court sentences Sanjoy Roy, the sole accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case, to life term. West Bengal government and CBI to appeal in HC for the death penalty
  • Supreme Court stays criminal defamation case against Rahul Gandhi for his remarks against home minister Amit Shah in Jharkhand during the AICC plenary session
  • Government reviews import basket to align it with the policies of the Trump administration
  • NCLT orders liquidation of GoAir airlines
  • Archery - Indian archers bagged 2 silver in Nimes Archery tournament in France
  • Stocks make impressive gain on Monday - Sensex adds 454 points to 77073 and Nifty 141 points to 23344
  • D Gukesh draws with Fabiano Caruana in the Tata Steel chess tournament in the Netherlands
  • Women's U-19 T20 WC - In a stunning game, debutants Nigeria beat New Zealand by 2 runs
  • Rohit Sharma to play under Ajinkye Rahane in Mumbai's Ranji match against J&K
  • Virat Kohli to play in Delhi's last group Ranji trophy match against Saurashtra. This will be his first Ranji match in 12 years
  • The toll in the Rajouri mystery illness case rose to 17 even as the Centre sent a team to study the situation
Calling the case not 'rarest of rare', a court in Kolkata sentenced Sanjay Roy, the only accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case to life in prison until death
oppn parties
Madras HC's Unusual Ruling In A Medical Negligence Case

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-02-06 11:33:26

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

Courts in India have been awarding realistic amounts as compensation in cases of medical negligence. But what the Madras HC ordered was unusual. It awarded the compensation in a detailed and segmented manner instead of awarding a lump sum amount to ensure that a girl born following a botched family planning procedure at a state-run hospital in Tamil Nadu was well provided for her living and education expenses till she turned 21.

The parents of the girl already had two children when the mother went to a state-run hospital for tubectomy. As a result of a botch up in the procedure, she conceived again after going through it. So they sued the hospital. After it was conclusively proved that her pregnancy happened despite the procedure due to medical negligence, the high court awarded the compensation in an unusual manner.

Holding the state responsible for the medical negligence at the state-run hospital by extension, the court directed the Tamil Nadu government to reimburse the entire educational expenses of the girl till she turns 21. "All the school and other fees paid shall be refunded by the state government; all her expenses on books, stationery, uniforms and other miscellaneous educational expenses, would also be met by the state", the court directed.

It further awarded the girl Rs 10000 per month for food and other expenses and Rs 3 lakh was awarded to the mother as compensation. The court said that "it becomes the bounded duty of state to meet the expenses of this child" as the child "is born because of failure of sterilization operation" and more so as the parents did not want to have the child as they had "no economic means to bring up another child".

While the court has issued this unusual order keeping the well being of the girl in mind, the fact is that the bureaucracy in India is famous for denying the citizen their due citing several rules. Since the educational expenses are to be reimbursed, the parents would have to approach the concerned department every time they will need funds. The court could have decided upon a reasonable sum for educational expenses too, to be paid monthly (with in-built yearly increments for inflation and increase in fees by institutions). That would have taken away the discretion of the state (in reimbursing claimed amount), delays and reduced the interaction with officialdom.

picture courtesy: the-aom-acdemy.com, caption ours