oppn parties Madras HC's Unusual Ruling In A Medical Negligence Case

News Snippets

  • Uttarakhand HC says marital discord, suspicion and quarrels cannot be held to be abetment of suicide
  • Two sisters, both brides-to-be, died by suspected suicide in Jodhpur. No suicide note was found
  • RTI reveals that 200 big cats were poached in India between 2005 and 2025, with the most in MP
  • After the US Supreme Court order on tariffs, Centre has put Indian trade team's US visit on hold
  • Delhi Police bust terror module linked to Lashkar that was plotting to strike in Delhi. Arrest 7 Bangladeshis with Aadhar IDs
  • PM Modi announced in his Mann Ki Baat that Edwin Lutyens' statue will be replaced with that of C Rajagopalchari at the Rashtrapati Bhawan
  • Facial recognition at Digi Yatra gates in Kolkata Airport suffered prolonged glitch on Sunday, forcing passengers to wait in long queues
  • Ranji Final: Strong Karnataka take on rising J&K in the match starting from Tuesday
  • Rising Stars women's cricket: India 'A' beat Bangladesh by 46 runs to capture title
  • Super 8s: Co-hosts Sri Lanka lose too, England beat them by 51 runs
  • Super 8s: South Africa crush India by 76 runs as nothing goes right for the hosts
  • PM Modi inaugurates India's fastest metro in Meerut and the first Vande Bharat sleeper in Bengal, This sleeper will cover Howrah to Guwahati route
  • After his consecutive failures, Abhishek Sharma has created a problem for the team management: should they give him one more chance in a vital match today or go for Sanju Samson as opener
  • A Pocso court in Prayagraj ordered an FIR against Swami Avi Mukteshawaranand and his disciple Muktanand Giri for molesting underage boys in their Magh Mela camp
  • TOI reported that while private universities filed more patents, elite institutions like IIT and IISc got more approvals between 2020-2025
T20 World Cup Super 8s: India get a reality check, outplayed by South Africa in their first match, end 12-match winning streak
oppn parties
Madras HC's Unusual Ruling In A Medical Negligence Case

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-02-06 11:33:26

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

Courts in India have been awarding realistic amounts as compensation in cases of medical negligence. But what the Madras HC ordered was unusual. It awarded the compensation in a detailed and segmented manner instead of awarding a lump sum amount to ensure that a girl born following a botched family planning procedure at a state-run hospital in Tamil Nadu was well provided for her living and education expenses till she turned 21.

The parents of the girl already had two children when the mother went to a state-run hospital for tubectomy. As a result of a botch up in the procedure, she conceived again after going through it. So they sued the hospital. After it was conclusively proved that her pregnancy happened despite the procedure due to medical negligence, the high court awarded the compensation in an unusual manner.

Holding the state responsible for the medical negligence at the state-run hospital by extension, the court directed the Tamil Nadu government to reimburse the entire educational expenses of the girl till she turns 21. "All the school and other fees paid shall be refunded by the state government; all her expenses on books, stationery, uniforms and other miscellaneous educational expenses, would also be met by the state", the court directed.

It further awarded the girl Rs 10000 per month for food and other expenses and Rs 3 lakh was awarded to the mother as compensation. The court said that "it becomes the bounded duty of state to meet the expenses of this child" as the child "is born because of failure of sterilization operation" and more so as the parents did not want to have the child as they had "no economic means to bring up another child".

While the court has issued this unusual order keeping the well being of the girl in mind, the fact is that the bureaucracy in India is famous for denying the citizen their due citing several rules. Since the educational expenses are to be reimbursed, the parents would have to approach the concerned department every time they will need funds. The court could have decided upon a reasonable sum for educational expenses too, to be paid monthly (with in-built yearly increments for inflation and increase in fees by institutions). That would have taken away the discretion of the state (in reimbursing claimed amount), delays and reduced the interaction with officialdom.

picture courtesy: the-aom-acdemy.com, caption ours