oppn parties Maligning Judges: A New, Unfortunate And Dangerous Trend

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Maligning Judges: A New, Unfortunate And Dangerous Trend

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-04-09 15:15:12

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Analyzing court orders from the legal viewpoint is a valid exercise. All analysts and commentators can present their reading of the law, with supporting arguments, which can be different from what the judges might have decided. That is healthy criticism and adds to the richness of legal literature. But maligning judges or imputing motives for any judgment they make is not correct. Governments, both at the Centre and in states, have been maligning judges if judicial pronouncements go against them. The Supreme Court took note of the fact and CJI NV Ramana said this in court.

While hearing a matter related to a judgment of the Chhatisgarh High Court that was challenged in the apex court, Justice Ramana said "whatever fight you may take, that is alright. But do not try to malign the courts. I am watching in this court also, it is a new trend". When senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi said he was not pressing that point, Justice Ramana further said that "no, we are watching it every day. You are a senior counsel, you have seen this more than us. It is a new trend. The government has started maligning judges. It is unfortunate".

The judiciary is the last resort for the citizen to get relief from executive highhandedness. Hence, the government must accept judicial pronouncements with an open mind and should not go after judges. If we have a pliant judiciary that does the bidding of the executive, very soon India will become a banana republic and rule of law will be forgotten. More than being unfortunate, this new trend is dangerous. The executive should respect the judiciary and fight cases on legal points instead of maligning judges.