oppn parties Maligning Judges: A New, Unfortunate And Dangerous Trend

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
Maligning Judges: A New, Unfortunate And Dangerous Trend

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-04-09 15:15:12

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

Analyzing court orders from the legal viewpoint is a valid exercise. All analysts and commentators can present their reading of the law, with supporting arguments, which can be different from what the judges might have decided. That is healthy criticism and adds to the richness of legal literature. But maligning judges or imputing motives for any judgment they make is not correct. Governments, both at the Centre and in states, have been maligning judges if judicial pronouncements go against them. The Supreme Court took note of the fact and CJI NV Ramana said this in court.

While hearing a matter related to a judgment of the Chhatisgarh High Court that was challenged in the apex court, Justice Ramana said "whatever fight you may take, that is alright. But do not try to malign the courts. I am watching in this court also, it is a new trend". When senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi said he was not pressing that point, Justice Ramana further said that "no, we are watching it every day. You are a senior counsel, you have seen this more than us. It is a new trend. The government has started maligning judges. It is unfortunate".

The judiciary is the last resort for the citizen to get relief from executive highhandedness. Hence, the government must accept judicial pronouncements with an open mind and should not go after judges. If we have a pliant judiciary that does the bidding of the executive, very soon India will become a banana republic and rule of law will be forgotten. More than being unfortunate, this new trend is dangerous. The executive should respect the judiciary and fight cases on legal points instead of maligning judges.