oppn parties Maternity Benefit Is A Matter Of Right

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Maternity Benefit Is A Matter Of Right

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2023-08-25 06:37:13

Is an employer entitled to stop paid maternity relief for a woman given the nature of her employment by considering it as a benefit she is not entitled to? Or is it is matter of right for a woman to get maternity relief regardless of the nature of her employment?

A single judge bench of the Delhi High Court has observed that maternity relief is not a benefit and is a matter of right for women. It ordered the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) to take action in three months to grant 26 weeks' maternity relief, including releasing medical, monetary and other benefits, to the petitioner.

The instant case was about an empanelled lawyer in DSLSA who had applied for such relief on conceiving. DSLSA denied the relief by claiming that she was not entitled to the same as she was only an empanelled advocate. The court observed that the social welfare legislation "certainly does not discriminate on the basis of the nature of employment of the beneficiaries".

It is a matter of anguish that even government bodies seek to deny pregnant employees the benefits which are theirs as a matter of right. Unless any Act or court order expressly prohibits or restricts maternity benefits to a certain class of employees (for instance, for having a third child), maternity relief is the right of every woman employee.

As the court rightly observed, the relief was granted to woman employees as social welfare legislation. It said that in this day and age, society should not fail to provide women with the means to thrive personally and professionally by asking them to choose between their familial life and career progression.

The court also highlighted the fact that although the petitioner was employed to protect the interests and welfare of juvenile children (she was appointed with the Juvenile Justice Board) suffering at the hands of the criminal justice system, she was being made to fight to "secure the benefits necessary for the best interest and welfare of her own child".