oppn parties Muslim Personal Law Should be Codified Without Delay

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Muslim Personal Law Should be Codified Without Delay

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2015-09-25 16:12:43

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
A majority of Muslim women are against the unilateral, oral triple talaq. A new study that was conducted by Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA) across 10 states and 4710 respondents, found that 92.1% of the Muslim women questioned favoured a ban on the discriminatory practice.

The beauty of the Muslim divorce practice as mandated by the Holy Quran (Sura Al Baqarah â€" 228,229 & 230, mainly) is that it has a built in waiting period. A man can pronounce the word talaq twice, after which he has to wait for the wife to have three monthly courses before he can pronounce the third talaq. Hence, not only is triple talaq pronounced at one go un-Islamic, it is also a crime against the Holy Quran.

The study also shows that 91.7% of the women also opposed a second marriage for their husbands. In India, there is a lot of misinformation regarding the provision of four or more marriages for Muslim males. The Holy Quran has not given each Muslim male an unhindered right to marry four or more times. What it says is that you can marry more than once but if you are not able to provide for all your wives equally and without discrimination, you must not so marry (Sura 4 {An Nisa}, Ayah 3). Islamcan.com puts it wonderfully when it says that the Quran “permits but does not command” Muslim men to have multiple wives. Even the Supreme Court, in the case Khursheed Ahmad Khan versus State of UP held that a practice cannot acquire religious sanction just because it is permitted and even the practice of having more wives than one can be regulated or prohibited in the interest of public order, morality and health.

The problems arise as Muslim personal law is not codified in India. Many Muslim countries, including Pakistan, Bangladesh and Yemen to name just three, have codified Muslim personal law. But any such attempt in India always draws howls of protest. Is it because India is not a Muslim country? Despite having the second largest Muslim population in the world, we have not been able to provide them with a modern, codified version of their law. The All India Muslim Law Board (AIMLB) is a body just in name. Its only job is to keep track of government or judicial pronouncements on anything concerning the Muslims and raise hell if it does not meet its approval.

Most women respondents in the above study favoured an intervention by the government to rectify the situation. Time has now come for the government to take the initiative to codify Muslim personal law. Islamic scholars can be consulted, codified laws of other Muslim countries can be studied and of course the Holy Quran has to be the ultimate reference book. But it has to be done without delay to stop discrimination against women and outlaw practices that have been banned in other Muslim nations.