oppn parties NCDRC Pulled Up For Withholding Reasoned Orders

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
NCDRC Pulled Up For Withholding Reasoned Orders

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2021-02-22 03:19:07

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

What happens when someone shows you a chocolate wrapper and says that the chocolate will be given later and delays the delivery endlessly? You are excited but not satisfied. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has been doing that for the last few years and it has now invited action from the Supreme Court.

The NCDRC had developed the peculiar habit of issuing the operative part of the order and reserving the reasoning part for delivery at a later date. For the party which won the case, it was like getting the chocolate wrapper and then waiting for the real stuff. For the loser, it was worst. He or she could not appeal against the order before getting the full order in hand.

The Supreme Court has now taken exception of this practice. It has said that "undisputedly, the rights of the aggrieved parties are being prejudiced if the reasons are not available to them to avail of the legal remedy of approaching the court where the reasons can be scrutinized. It indeed amounts to defeating the rights of party aggrieved to challenge the impugned judgment on merits and even the succeeding party is unable to enjoy the fruits of success of the litigation".

It is true that it is not always possible for judicial authorities to pronounce full judgments immediately. Most courts in India reserve their judgments after completing the hearing. But they deliver the full judgment in a reasonable time. In most important cases this can be as early as the next day but in most other cases it is done within a few weeks. The Supreme Court has now asked the President of the NCDRC to ensure that this practice is not adhered to from now on and all pending judgments are delivered to the litigants in two months. This will bring huge relief to parties who have been made to wait endlessly for full judgments from the NCDRC.