oppn parties NEET Counseling Dispute Must Be Resolved At The Earliest

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
NEET Counseling Dispute Must Be Resolved At The Earliest

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-12-29 06:09:02

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The continuing strike by doctors in Delhi is a result of too many factors. First, due to the Covid situation, the normal schedule of NEET exam in January and counseling in March was not possible this year. The exam was held in September and the results were declared at the end of the month. Normally, the counseling would have been over by November and almost 45000 doctors would have joined their respective colleges in December. But the court case against the 27% OBC and 10% economically weaker section (EWS) quota delayed the counseling process. The next hearing in the Supreme Court is on January 6. The government has assured the striking doctors that it will resolve the issue in court and has asked them to call off the stir. But the doctors have refused to listen.

As the Covid situation once again seems to be escalating with the Omicron threat looming large, an additional 45000 doctors in medical colleges will give a huge boost to India's medical infrastructure. The doctors are not wrong. The EWS quota angle is being dragged in the court for a long time. Essentially, the court wants to know how the government arrived at the figure an annual income of Rs. 8 lakh as the threshold to decide economic weakness. The court wants to know whether any logical thinking went into arriving at the figure or whether it was done arbitrarily. If the government had done so logically, it should present its calculations instantly. Why ask for time for something that must be there in the records?

The government must ensure that it resolves the matter in the Supreme Court on January 6. It must present facts before the court and impress upon it that healthcare services are being derailed due to the strike by the doctors and decision has to be taken fast. In the meantime, given the rising number of Covid cases, the doctors must end their strike and return to work. They can resume the agitation if nothing positive happens in the court on that date or the next date if the Supreme Court does not give its decision on that day.