oppn parties No Critics: The Silencer Effect

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
No Critics: The Silencer Effect

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2021-10-07 08:37:07

Prime Minister Modi made a surprising remark a couple of days back. He said that there were very few critics of the government in India now. He also rightly said that criticism, and its quality, is the backbone of democratic debate.

The Prime Minister must recognize that at any given point of time, there are more than 50% citizens of the country who have not voted for the BJP. Logically, they did not do so as they are against the policies of the government, either stated in the election manifesto or made public through other channels. Logically, too, this huge mass of people is bound to be critical of the government. Not all of them are educated enough or aware enough to raise their voices. But many are and have been doing it forcefully.

And what is the response of the government to them? It equates the criticism of government with criticism of the nation and brands then "anti-nationals". It uses colonial era sedition laws and other draconian provisions against them, many of whom are college kids, to send them to jail. When a section of the media criticizes government policy, it is subjected to I-T raids and other agencies are let loose. All this has a chilling and silencing effect on critics. After all, not many are brave enough to continue their campaign against the might of the state out to silence them. But, fortunately for the nation, there are many others who continue to fight.

Criticism of government policies and the debate that ensues can remain informed and healthy only if the government allows it to be. By steering the debate to a negative corner and by making it an issue of "them" against "us", of "anti-nationals" against "nationalists", the government is doing a great disservice to the nation and to democracy. If the government learns to tolerate informed criticism and participates in debates without an agenda, it will find that it can amend its policies suitably from the feedback and that would be of great benefit to the nation. But that is asking too much from a government that seems bent on imposing its views by force.