oppn parties Not A Well Thought Out Decision

News Snippets

  • 2nd ODI: Rohit Sharma roars back to form with a scintillating ton as India beat England by 4 wickets in a high scoring match in Cuttack
  • Supreme Court will appoint an observer for the mayoral poll in Chandigarh
  • Government makes it compulsory for plastic carry bag makers to put a QR or barcode with their details on such bags
  • GBS outbreak in Pune leaves 73 ill with 14 on ventilator. GBS is a rare but treatable autoimmune disease
  • Madhya Pradesh government banned sale and consumption of liquor at 19 religious sites including Ujjain and Chitrakoot
  • Odisha emerges at the top in the fiscal health report of states while Haryana is at the bottom
  • JSW Steel net profit takes a massive hit of 70% in Q3
  • Tatas buy 60% stake in Pegatron, the contractor making iPhone's in India
  • Stocks return to negative zone - Sensex sheds 329 points to 76190 and Nifty loses 113 points to 23092
  • Bumrah, Jadeja and Yashasvi Jaiswal make the ICC Test team of the year even as no Indian found a place in the ODI squad
  • India take on England in the second T20 today at Chennai. They lead the 5-match series 1-0
  • Ravindra Jadeja excels in Ranji Trophy, takes 12 wickets in the match as Saurashtra beat Delhi by 10 wickets. All other Team India stars disappoint in the national tournament
  • Madhya Pradesh HC says collectors must not apply NSA "under political pressure and without application of mind"
  • Oxfam charged by CBI over violation of FCRA
  • Indian students in the US have started quitting part-time jobs (which are not legally allowed as per visa rules) over fears of deportation
Manipur Chief Minister Biren Singh resigns after meeting Home Minister Amit Shah and BJP chief J P Nadda /////// President's Rule likely in Manipur
oppn parties
Not A Well Thought Out Decision

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2023-05-23 06:04:32

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

Most government policy decisions are said to be well thought out - or they should be. Since they are well thought out, they must be clear and must not cause problems for the citizens. But the decision of the RBI to withdraw the Rs 2000 banknote with a deadline to deposit or exchange them does not seem to be one such policy decision.

Consider the fact that the RBI has stopped printing Rs 2000 banknotes from 2018 onwards. Hence, their share in the total currency in the economy has dropped down to just 11%. Banks have for long stopped giving Rs 2000 currency notes when customers withdraw cash. They have stopped receiving the same from currency chests and were only giving such notes in withdrawals by customers as and when another customer deposited the same.

Hence, if the current position was allowed to continue, with a little more strictness (with direction to banks not to issue any notes to the public but deposit them with the currency chests as and when any customer deposited the same in their accounts), the share of the said notes would have been reduced to an insignificant number in a couple of years. But the RBI public circular has caused an unnecessary alarm.

The worst part is that the apex bank has said that the notes remain legal tender and then prescribed a timeline within which they have to be exchanged or deposited. This has confused everyone and it is demonetization by another name. The very fact that the RBI has been forced to issue several daily clarifications shows that the decision was not well thought out and the original announcement lacked clarity. The apex bank has faltered. It should have let the note remain legal tender and should have squeezed it out of circulation by prohibiting banks from issuing it back. That would have not confused the citizenry and not caused such alarm.