oppn parties Payment For Amenities Can Be Included In Total Cost Of Acquisition Of A Flat

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Payment For Amenities Can Be Included In Total Cost Of Acquisition Of A Flat

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-12-14 10:19:53

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

 In a landmark order that is likely to benefit many flat owners who have to pay capital gains tax if they sell their flats, the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)'s Mumbai bench ruled in the favour of a taxpayer by allowing her to claim the cost of documented amenities (as distinct from furniture and fittings) in the total cost of acquisition before adjusting for indexation and arriving at the capital gain she made when she sold her flat.

The dispute arose as the assessing officer disallowed the payment made for amenities added to her flat in the total cost of acquisition, thereby increasing the capital gain she made and consequently, the tax payable by her rose by a handsome amount. The taxpayer appealed to the ITAT which directed the I-T officer to ascertain whether other flat owners had also availed of the said amenities and paid for them.

The assessing officers do not keep up with the times and almost always complete income tax assessments going by the rule book and past precedent. But even if the law does not change, there are certain areas where commercial practices and documentary evidence can guide the officers to conclude the genuineness of the claims.

In the instant case, it was found that 33 other flat owners in the society had availed of the amenities offer by paying various amounts to a sister concern of the promoters which provided them with the said amenities. The appellant taxpayer had documentary evidence of having paid Rs 9.4 lakh for special water proofing in toilets and the kitchen and special wood for the windows. These amenities increase the cost of acquisition as they add value to the property. Obviously, they fetch a better sale price too.

Further, the appellant taxpayer had been showing the said payment as an addition to her cost of acquisition in her financial statements and I-T returns from the year she purchased the property. The ITAT decided in her favour after taking into account all documentary evidence.

Real estate is now being sold in India with many add-ons, like passenger cars. Builders have a base unit where they give normal things. But a buyer can always pay more to get his or her flat custom built. That adds value to the property and increases the cost of acquisition. The taxman has to consider this when calculating capital gains provided the taxpayer has all documentary evidence like agreements, bills and proof of payment and has included the same in his or her financial statements from the date of purchase.