oppn parties Politicians Must Be Put On A Verbal Leash During Electioneering

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
Politicians Must Be Put On A Verbal Leash During Electioneering

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-02-17 13:54:18

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The overall decline in public discourse in India shows its ugliest face during election campaigns. Close on the heels of the utterly gross remark on Rahul Gandhi's parentage by Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma come the controversial statement by Punjab chief minister Charanjit Singh Channi who exhorted voters in Punjab to keep "bhaiyyas" from UP and Bihar out of the state.

Sarma made the foul remark while campaigning in UP. He was worked up that Rahul Gandhi and the Congress had demanded proof of the surgical strikes by the Indian Army in Pakistan. He said that if the people do not demand the proof whether Rahul is actually the son of late Rajiv and Sonia Gandhi, why does he demand proof of everything, especially something vouched for by the Army. How, pray, are the two things related? Even by the leeway granted to politicians during election campaigns, this was one of the worst remarks one has heard in a long time. But such is the standard of public discourse in India that politicians do not think twice before unleashing the worst of abuse.

Channi, on the other hand, thinks that Punjab belongs only to the Punjabis. Does he know that migrant labour from Bihar and UP are the ones who provide yeoman's service on the fields and help in Punjab being the granary of India? Does he know that Punjabis from all walks of life have migrated to other states (and even abroad) in large numbers and are flourishing and well respected wherever they have settled? In any case, India, including Punjab, is for all Indians irrespective of where they come from. Instead of talking about desh jodo, Channi was indulging in desh todo by instigating the Punjab voters against people from UP and Bihar.

Enough is enough. Such unparliamentary language should be banned even during election campaigns. Politicians must learn to be civil and must not make personal attacks and remarks that disparage a community or a class of people during election campaigning. It is shameful that politicians who are expected to lead by example are becoming the worst examples of all that is wrong. The Election Commission has turned into a toothless body and cannot be expected to control this as it had done nothing about inflammatory hate speeches in the past. Banning a star campaigner for a few days is not the solution. Such speeches should be banned and if made, the person should be made to immediately relinquish all posts he or she holds and be barred from contesting elections for 5 years. An independent body headed by a retired Supreme Court judge and comprising of civil society representatives must decide who crosses the limit as per well-defined parameters. The attitude of anything goes during electioneering must be discarded.