oppn parties Rape Victim Sentenced To Jail For Contempt in Bihar

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
Rape Victim Sentenced To Jail For Contempt in Bihar

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2020-07-16 14:34:04

The disturbing incident of a gang-rape survivor being sent to jail by a miffed judge in Bihar, who was not concerned with understanding the reason behind her breakdown in court and subsequent inappropriate actions but chose to stick to rules and protocol in booking her for her misdemeanor by ordering judicial custody of 14 days, has created a huge controversy. The FIR against the victim and members of an NGO that was helping her charges all of them with threatening behavior, use of foul language, obstructing judicial proceedings and snatching documents from the judge's hand.

If true, none of the above actions can be condoned. A judge has to be respected at all times and the rules and protocols of the court have to be followed by all who are present there, including the victim. Otherwise, the sanctity and authority of law will be debased and there will be a free for all. But the judge could have been lenient in the case of the rape victim by understanding her trauma and the reasons for her breakdown.

It is being reported that against all accepted norms, the victim was asked to wait in a dingy corridor of the court premises in close proximity with an alleged accomplice of the rapists. Imagine the mental abuse she might have been subjected to by the man. Then, as she was waiting for the judge to arrive, the court clerk is alleged to have started questioning her. If she had a nervous breakdown in court after three hours of waiting, the judge could have let her off with a warning for her indecent behavior or at best sentenced her for a day to set an example. He could have sent the NGO members to jail for misleading and instigating her if he thought fit. But it was insensitive on his part to hand out such a harsh punishment to the woman that would worsen the trauma she has suffered due to the gang-rape.

Lawyers all across the country have already written to the chief justice and other judges of the Patna High Court seeking their intervention in the matter. A judicial inquiry must be conducted in the incident and systemic changes, including guidelines for dealing with such cases in lower courts, must be prescribed by the High Courts or the Supreme Court.