oppn parties Rape Victim Sentenced To Jail For Contempt in Bihar

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Rape Victim Sentenced To Jail For Contempt in Bihar

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2020-07-16 14:34:04

The disturbing incident of a gang-rape survivor being sent to jail by a miffed judge in Bihar, who was not concerned with understanding the reason behind her breakdown in court and subsequent inappropriate actions but chose to stick to rules and protocol in booking her for her misdemeanor by ordering judicial custody of 14 days, has created a huge controversy. The FIR against the victim and members of an NGO that was helping her charges all of them with threatening behavior, use of foul language, obstructing judicial proceedings and snatching documents from the judge's hand.

If true, none of the above actions can be condoned. A judge has to be respected at all times and the rules and protocols of the court have to be followed by all who are present there, including the victim. Otherwise, the sanctity and authority of law will be debased and there will be a free for all. But the judge could have been lenient in the case of the rape victim by understanding her trauma and the reasons for her breakdown.

It is being reported that against all accepted norms, the victim was asked to wait in a dingy corridor of the court premises in close proximity with an alleged accomplice of the rapists. Imagine the mental abuse she might have been subjected to by the man. Then, as she was waiting for the judge to arrive, the court clerk is alleged to have started questioning her. If she had a nervous breakdown in court after three hours of waiting, the judge could have let her off with a warning for her indecent behavior or at best sentenced her for a day to set an example. He could have sent the NGO members to jail for misleading and instigating her if he thought fit. But it was insensitive on his part to hand out such a harsh punishment to the woman that would worsen the trauma she has suffered due to the gang-rape.

Lawyers all across the country have already written to the chief justice and other judges of the Patna High Court seeking their intervention in the matter. A judicial inquiry must be conducted in the incident and systemic changes, including guidelines for dealing with such cases in lower courts, must be prescribed by the High Courts or the Supreme Court.