oppn parties Reservation in Faculty Recruitment Should Be a Strict No-No

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Reservation in Faculty Recruitment Should Be a Strict No-No

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-09-26 21:08:10

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
Despite raising the hope that it will be different, Narendra Modi’s government is increasingly acting to maintain the status quo in some areas and continue with regressive thinking in others. Its latest order of asking the IIM’s to apply the policy of reservation in faculty recruitment is regressive. It will mean that the management learning institutes will no longer be able to hire the best talent.

If one recognizes the fact that an institute can be as good as its faculty, forcing any institute to hire anyone but the best is like asking it not to be good. Is the government trying to dilute the high standard that the IIM’s have maintained since inception? The IIT’s and the Central universities have already been arm twisted into toeing this line. The IIM’s should be spared this in the interests of world class learning.

Although HRD minister Prakash Javadekar had modified the draconian clauses in the draft IIM Act proposed by his predecessor Smriti Irani, the reservation clause has remained and is now being enforced. The government is not realizing that if a person deserving affirmative action cannot bring himself up to freely compete with his peers till such a high level, than he does not deserve to be held by hand any longer.

The reservation policy in India can be grudgingly justified till the graduation level. But in higher education and faculty recruitment it has the potential of saddling the country with undeserving and mediocre talent. Faculty recruitment by reservations will put mediocre teachers in charge which in turn will produce mediocre pupils. That is not the situation India wants 10 years from now.You cannot have mediocre teachers appointed through reservation and world class institutes at the same time. World class institutes need world class teachers and they can only be recruited through merit based selection procedure.

If a person who has used the quota system to reach a position where he can apply to be a professor in any higher education institute, he should always compete on merit. Otherwise, he is himself admitting that the quota has not helped him make a better person in all these years. In that case, there is no merit in the argument that he be allowed the job as he is ST/SC, OBC, or any of the other categories. Our future generations should not be subjected to half-baked learning from undeserving people. They deserve the best teachers and those cannot be appointed through reservation.