oppn parties Reservations: Leave the Judiciary Alone

News Snippets

  • Uttarakhand HC says marital discord, suspicion and quarrels cannot be held to be abetment of suicide
  • Two sisters, both brides-to-be, died by suspected suicide in Jodhpur. No suicide note was found
  • RTI reveals that 200 big cats were poached in India between 2005 and 2025, with the most in MP
  • After the US Supreme Court order on tariffs, Centre has put Indian trade team's US visit on hold
  • Delhi Police bust terror module linked to Lashkar that was plotting to strike in Delhi. Arrest 7 Bangladeshis with Aadhar IDs
  • PM Modi announced in his Mann Ki Baat that Edwin Lutyens' statue will be replaced with that of C Rajagopalchari at the Rashtrapati Bhawan
  • Facial recognition at Digi Yatra gates in Kolkata Airport suffered prolonged glitch on Sunday, forcing passengers to wait in long queues
  • Ranji Final: Strong Karnataka take on rising J&K in the match starting from Tuesday
  • Rising Stars women's cricket: India 'A' beat Bangladesh by 46 runs to capture title
  • Super 8s: Co-hosts Sri Lanka lose too, England beat them by 51 runs
  • Super 8s: South Africa crush India by 76 runs as nothing goes right for the hosts
  • PM Modi inaugurates India's fastest metro in Meerut and the first Vande Bharat sleeper in Bengal, This sleeper will cover Howrah to Guwahati route
  • After his consecutive failures, Abhishek Sharma has created a problem for the team management: should they give him one more chance in a vital match today or go for Sanju Samson as opener
  • A Pocso court in Prayagraj ordered an FIR against Swami Avi Mukteshawaranand and his disciple Muktanand Giri for molesting underage boys in their Magh Mela camp
  • TOI reported that while private universities filed more patents, elite institutions like IIT and IISc got more approvals between 2020-2025
T20 World Cup Super 8s: India get a reality check, outplayed by South Africa in their first match, end 12-match winning streak
oppn parties
Reservations: Leave the Judiciary Alone

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-07-29 19:46:07

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
In a recent speech in UP, Nitish Kumar demanded reservation for dalits in the judiciary. He said that “the current reservation policy and the one envisaged by Babasaheb Ambedkar trace its origin to Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj. However, much needs to be done and achieved. We have miles to go. The 'bahujans' must get reservation in every field and sector including the judiciary.” While Nitish did not go on to elaborate on this, it was not an off the cuff remark and one is sure a lot would be heard about it in coming days.

In a bid to win the support of dalits before the UP elections, Nitish has made a grave error. Despite the political necessity for affirmative action, there are some areas where merit has to rule. Judiciary is one such area. Indian judiciary is known for its independence and is a strong pillar of support to the citizens against the arbitrary and highhanded decisions of the political, bureaucratic and business classes. Hence, all attempts to politicize it should be strongly resisted.

As it is, there is an ongoing tussle between the government and the Supreme Court over the right to appointment of judges to high courts and the Supreme Court. The apex court had already rejected the NJAC and reverted to the collegiums system. But the government has been sending back suggested names. This has created a situation where justice is suffering due to huge vacancies in high courts. If an element of reservation is introduced to further politicize the process, there will be a complete breakdown.

Dalits or other socially disadvantaged persons can be handheld only this far and no further. This far in case of India means till higher education. When there is an element of competition for jobs which help in governing the country, even a 5% relaxation of marks for candidates citing affirmative action is regressive and should not be tolerated. If a disadvantaged person cannot compete with his peers on equal terms despite having been provided with free education and admissions to elite institutions on relaxed norms, he is not worth to be employed. The best should be employed to run the nation or its judiciary. If dalits can make it on merit, they are most welcome. But neither reservation nor relaxed norms should be allowed for judicial posts.