oppn parties Reservations: Leave the Judiciary Alone

News Snippets

  • The government says Covid-19 is still in local transmission stage in India
  • Government scotches rumours of extending the lockdown beyond April14. Says no such plan
  • Centre asks states to give shelter and food to migrant workers to stop them from taking to the streets
  • RBI cuts repo rate by 75 bps, the steepest in 10 years
  • Centre writes to states regarding laxity in monitoring people who had arrived from abroad between January and March
  • Kerala reports a spurt in new cases
  • With 124 fresh cases on Friday, the number of reported cases in India stand at 854
  • Five of a family, including a 9-month-old-baby test positive for Covid-19 in Nadia district in West Bengal on Friday
  • The Pakistani army is reportedly forcibly moving all Covid-19 patients to PoK and Gilgit
  • Untimely azaans in J&K mosques spark panic gathering
  • Stocks rise - Sensex up by 1400 points and Nifty goes above the 8600 mark
  • Rahul Gandhi says the economic package is "the first step in the right direction"
  • The government announces wide-ranging measures to help the poor overcome the economic hardship caused by Covid-19
  • G20 leaders to hold a virtual meeting today to explore ways of fighting Covid-19 in a coordinated manner
  • The Delhi government orders testing of all medical staff after the positive test on a Delhi mohalla clinic doctor
Death toll reaches 27 as Covid-19 cases across India reach 974 on Saturday
oppn parties
Reservations: Leave the Judiciary Alone

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-07-29 19:46:07

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
In a recent speech in UP, Nitish Kumar demanded reservation for dalits in the judiciary. He said that “the current reservation policy and the one envisaged by Babasaheb Ambedkar trace its origin to Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj. However, much needs to be done and achieved. We have miles to go. The 'bahujans' must get reservation in every field and sector including the judiciary.” While Nitish did not go on to elaborate on this, it was not an off the cuff remark and one is sure a lot would be heard about it in coming days.

In a bid to win the support of dalits before the UP elections, Nitish has made a grave error. Despite the political necessity for affirmative action, there are some areas where merit has to rule. Judiciary is one such area. Indian judiciary is known for its independence and is a strong pillar of support to the citizens against the arbitrary and highhanded decisions of the political, bureaucratic and business classes. Hence, all attempts to politicize it should be strongly resisted.

As it is, there is an ongoing tussle between the government and the Supreme Court over the right to appointment of judges to high courts and the Supreme Court. The apex court had already rejected the NJAC and reverted to the collegiums system. But the government has been sending back suggested names. This has created a situation where justice is suffering due to huge vacancies in high courts. If an element of reservation is introduced to further politicize the process, there will be a complete breakdown.

Dalits or other socially disadvantaged persons can be handheld only this far and no further. This far in case of India means till higher education. When there is an element of competition for jobs which help in governing the country, even a 5% relaxation of marks for candidates citing affirmative action is regressive and should not be tolerated. If a disadvantaged person cannot compete with his peers on equal terms despite having been provided with free education and admissions to elite institutions on relaxed norms, he is not worth to be employed. The best should be employed to run the nation or its judiciary. If dalits can make it on merit, they are most welcome. But neither reservation nor relaxed norms should be allowed for judicial posts.