oppn parties Reservations: Leave the Judiciary Alone

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Reservations: Leave the Judiciary Alone

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-07-29 19:46:07

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
In a recent speech in UP, Nitish Kumar demanded reservation for dalits in the judiciary. He said that “the current reservation policy and the one envisaged by Babasaheb Ambedkar trace its origin to Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj. However, much needs to be done and achieved. We have miles to go. The 'bahujans' must get reservation in every field and sector including the judiciary.” While Nitish did not go on to elaborate on this, it was not an off the cuff remark and one is sure a lot would be heard about it in coming days.

In a bid to win the support of dalits before the UP elections, Nitish has made a grave error. Despite the political necessity for affirmative action, there are some areas where merit has to rule. Judiciary is one such area. Indian judiciary is known for its independence and is a strong pillar of support to the citizens against the arbitrary and highhanded decisions of the political, bureaucratic and business classes. Hence, all attempts to politicize it should be strongly resisted.

As it is, there is an ongoing tussle between the government and the Supreme Court over the right to appointment of judges to high courts and the Supreme Court. The apex court had already rejected the NJAC and reverted to the collegiums system. But the government has been sending back suggested names. This has created a situation where justice is suffering due to huge vacancies in high courts. If an element of reservation is introduced to further politicize the process, there will be a complete breakdown.

Dalits or other socially disadvantaged persons can be handheld only this far and no further. This far in case of India means till higher education. When there is an element of competition for jobs which help in governing the country, even a 5% relaxation of marks for candidates citing affirmative action is regressive and should not be tolerated. If a disadvantaged person cannot compete with his peers on equal terms despite having been provided with free education and admissions to elite institutions on relaxed norms, he is not worth to be employed. The best should be employed to run the nation or its judiciary. If dalits can make it on merit, they are most welcome. But neither reservation nor relaxed norms should be allowed for judicial posts.