oppn parties Reservations: Leave the Judiciary Alone

News Snippets

  • Congress today alleged that the Census has been delayed as the BJP wants to abolish SC/ST quota
  • Delhi LG V K Saxena defers MCD mayoral polls as he says he cannot get the opinion of the Delhi CM (Arvind Kejriwal is in jail over the liqour excise case) on the issue of appointing the presiding officer
  • Mamata Banerjee calls former Calcutta HC judge Abhijit Ganguly, who resigned from the bench to join the BJP, 'a blot on judiciary' even as her nephew Abhishek alleged that a section of the court was taking instructions from the BJP
  • Polls in 88 seats today in the second phase of voting in India
  • In a landmark order, the Supreme Court has ruled that for a woman streedhan is "her absolute property with all rights to dispose of at her own pleasure" and it cannot be termed a joint property of the couple with the husband having no control over it
  • India says US report alleging human rights' violation in India is 'deeply biased' and they have no understanding of the situation in the country
  • PM Modi says poeple said Rajiv Gandhi abolished estate duty law to escape tax on the property he inherited from his mother Indira Gandhi
  • 30 aircraft ordered by Indigo for long haul operations. Total bill $9.5bn
  • Kotak Bank shares plunge 11% over RBI action, value plunges to allow Axis Bank to become the 3rd most valued bank in India
  • Kumaramangalam Birla says post the Rs 18K cr FPO, Vi has got a new lease of life even as investors gained 26% in a week as share price zooms to Rs 13.9 on Thursday (FPO was at Rs 11)
  • Stocks continue their winning runs on a volatile day's trading on Thursday: Sensex gains 486 points to 74339 and Nifty adds 167 points to 22570
  • Newly-crowned Candidates' Chess champion and world title challenger D Gukesh says he hopes his win will inspire the next generation of chess players in India
  • IPL: RCB beats SRH by 35 runs, Rajat Patidar plays an explosive knowck of 50 in just 20 balls
  • Congress says party has nothing to do with Pitroda's inheritance tax views and they are his own private views
  • Commenting on Sam Pitroda's remarks on inheritance tax, PM Modi says Congress wants to loot citizens even after their death
Election Commission sends notices to BJP and Congress on speeches by PM Modi and Rahul Gandhi, seeks replies by Monday morning
oppn parties
Reservations: Leave the Judiciary Alone

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-07-29 19:46:07

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
In a recent speech in UP, Nitish Kumar demanded reservation for dalits in the judiciary. He said that “the current reservation policy and the one envisaged by Babasaheb Ambedkar trace its origin to Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj. However, much needs to be done and achieved. We have miles to go. The 'bahujans' must get reservation in every field and sector including the judiciary.” While Nitish did not go on to elaborate on this, it was not an off the cuff remark and one is sure a lot would be heard about it in coming days.

In a bid to win the support of dalits before the UP elections, Nitish has made a grave error. Despite the political necessity for affirmative action, there are some areas where merit has to rule. Judiciary is one such area. Indian judiciary is known for its independence and is a strong pillar of support to the citizens against the arbitrary and highhanded decisions of the political, bureaucratic and business classes. Hence, all attempts to politicize it should be strongly resisted.

As it is, there is an ongoing tussle between the government and the Supreme Court over the right to appointment of judges to high courts and the Supreme Court. The apex court had already rejected the NJAC and reverted to the collegiums system. But the government has been sending back suggested names. This has created a situation where justice is suffering due to huge vacancies in high courts. If an element of reservation is introduced to further politicize the process, there will be a complete breakdown.

Dalits or other socially disadvantaged persons can be handheld only this far and no further. This far in case of India means till higher education. When there is an element of competition for jobs which help in governing the country, even a 5% relaxation of marks for candidates citing affirmative action is regressive and should not be tolerated. If a disadvantaged person cannot compete with his peers on equal terms despite having been provided with free education and admissions to elite institutions on relaxed norms, he is not worth to be employed. The best should be employed to run the nation or its judiciary. If dalits can make it on merit, they are most welcome. But neither reservation nor relaxed norms should be allowed for judicial posts.