oppn parties Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana: No Model Village To Show Even After 6 Years

News Snippets

  • University vice-chancellors in West Bengal decide not to hold final-year examinations despite UGC prod, will instead go by the state government advised 80-20 formula where 80% will be marked on performance in past semesters and 20% on internal assessments in the final semester
  • The Centre wants the ITI and other top Indian firms to bid for 5G as Chinese firms Huawei and ZTE are not likely to be allowed to participate
  • India and China agree on total disengagement to return to peace ahead of the next round of military talks
  • The Supreme Court allows delivery of summons and notices via WhatsApp and email, but questions remain on proof of actual receipt
  • National Investigation Agency says the proceeds from the Kerala gold smuggling case could have been used for terrorist activities
  • Four Maoists shot dead in Valmiki Tiger Reserve in Bihar
  • Despite localized lockdown, Covid cases continue to rise at an alarming rate in West Bengal. Newer areas brought under containment zones in Kolkata
  • ICSE, ISC results declared, Average scores in the English paper, 20% lower this year than the average in most years, pulls down the aggregate for most candidates
  • IIP contracts by 35% in May. Manufacturing goes down by 39.3%
  • Row erupts over CBSE's decision to reduce the syllabus by 30% this academic year due to the disruption caused by the pandemic. Experts say several lessons that the ruling dispensation does not like are being removed
  • Gangster Vikas Dubey's nephew killed in an encounter by UP police who also pick up his key aide Raju Khullar and his son Adarsh
  • MHA sets up an inter-ministerial committee to probe the alleged financial misdeeds of three trusts linked to the Gandhi family
  • Actor Jagdeep, most famous for his Soorma Bhopali act in Sholay, passes away
  • Pakistan says Kulbhushan Jadhav has declined to file a review petition and will stick to his mercy plea. India calls it a farce
  • India to keep a strict vigil to confirm that the Chinese are abiding by the deal on the pullback at the LAC
Amitabh Bachchan and his son Abhishek admitted to hospital for coronavirus
oppn parties
Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana: No Model Village To Show Even After 6 Years

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-06-22 22:06:22

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

The rural development ministry commissioned a review-cum-audit of all rural schemes. Called the Common Review Mission-2019, the audit has painted a not so rosy picture of Prime Minister Modi's pet scheme, the Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana (SAGY), or the scheme for each MP to adopt a village in his constituency and develop it as a model village. On paper, it was an excellent initiative as it would have taken the MP to the grassroots and would have brought her or him closer to the people. It would have given birth to model villages that could have been replicated throughout the constituency. It would have also improved infrastructure, created jobs, brought prosperity to the villagers and given a huge boost to local self-government. By understanding and addressing the problems of one village, the lawmaker could have understood the problems of most of his rural constituents.

But alas, nothing of that sort has happened in the six years that the scheme has been in operation. The committee categorically stated that "the CRM teams that visited the states did not find any significant impact of this scheme. In many of the SAGY villages, MPs did not give any significant money from MPLADS. In isolated cases, where MPs have been proactive, some infrastructure development has taken place, but the scheme has not made any perceptible impact". It went on to make a damning assessment to say that "as such, these villages cannot be called model villages. The CRM is of the opinion that in the current format, the scheme is not achieving the desired purpose. It is recommended that the ministry may review the scheme for enhancing its impact."

The report of the committee points out that the major flaw was the reluctance of the MPs to allocate money from their MPLAD funds. Who goes to a village to see what work is being done? Why satisfy a handful of voters? If the MPLAD fund is used to construct, say, a bus shelter in a city or town with huge signages proclaiming so, it might influence a good number of voters. The reluctance to fund for developing a model village shows the priorities of our lawmakers. The second flaw, which the committee did not point out, is due to the caste, religious and other calculations. No MP would be able to select a single village that would not leave him open to charges of either favoritism or discrimination. They would thus be reluctant to wholeheartedly support such a scheme.

The scheme either needs to be redesigned or scrapped. If it is redesigned then either separate funds need to be allocated for it or it must be made mandatory for MPs to spend a specified percentage of MPLAD funds for the scheme. For, in the absence of dedicated funding, the scheme is not going to take off. Also, it must be made mandatory for the MP to spend a given number of days every year in the village. Finally, the selection of the village must be made through computer software and randomly to prevent the MP from suffering any backlash. If these and other prickly things that are discovered cannot be done, then it would be better to give the scheme a quiet burial.