oppn parties SC Says Death Row Convicts Have Right to Dignity and Judicial Remedy

News Snippets

  • In reply to a question in Parliament, the government says it is empowered to lawfully intercept, monitor or decrpyt information stored in a computer resource in the interest of sovereignty or integrity of India
  • Police stop a 12-year old girl on her way to the Sabarimala shrine
  • In Karnataka, the JD(S) indicates that it might support the BJP government if it falls short of numbers after the bypolls
  • Congress pips the BJP in local body elections in Rajasthan, winning 961 wards to the BJPs 737
  • After Airtel and Vodafone-Idea, Jio also indicates that tariffs will be raised from December
  • Sources in Shiv Sena say that they might revive the alliance with the BJP if it offers the 50:50 deal
  • A miffed Sanjay Rout of the Shiv Sena says that it will take "100 births" to understand Sharad Pawar
  • Mobile operators Vodafone-Idea and Airtel decide to raise tariffs from next month
  • Sharad Pawar meets Sonia Gandhi and says more time needed for government formation in Maharashtra
  • Justice S A Bobde sworn in as the 47th Chief Justice of India
  • Supreme Court holds hotels liable for theft of vehicle from their parking area if parked by valet, says "owner's risk" clause is not a shield from such liability
  • Finance Minister says she is receiving feedback from many sectors that recovery is happening as there is lower stress
  • Sabarimala temple opens, but police bar the entry of women below 50 years
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman says Air India and BPCL to be sold off by March
  • Media person Rajat Sharma resigns as DDCA president
Two Muslim litigants in Ayodhya refuse to accept the Supreme Court order, say review petition might be filed
oppn parties
SC Says Death Row Convicts Have Right to Dignity and Judicial Remedy

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
Does a person lose his right to life with dignity and access to legal aid the minute his death warrant is signed by a court of law? The Supreme Court does not think so. The apex court rightly said that due process of law should be followed in all such cases as the signing of the death warrant does not mean the convict will eventually be hanged. For, he has the option to file a review petition in the Supreme Court and then ask for mercy from the state Governor and failing that, the President.

In the case of the couple Shabnam and Saleem, although the court had earlier upheld the death penalty for the couple who were accused of murdering 7 members of the girl’s family, including a 10 month old child, it stayed their sentence as the Sessions court in Amroha district of UP did not follow procedures and guidelines in signing the death warrant.

The lower court threw all judicial norms and detailed guidelines laid down by both SC and the Allahabad HC to the wind and signed the death warrant in a record six days after the SC judgment upholding the death sentence. The norm is to wait for at least 30 days to give the convicts time to seek judicial remedy available to them.

The Supreme Court was also of the opinion that dignity should be accorded to death row convicts. If they are not able to arrange for legal assistance, the same must be provided by the court. They must be allowed to meet family members. The Court was of the opinion that convicts should not be hanged secretly and in haste.

It is surprising that the Amroha judge signed the death warrant despite the guidelines. Either he was not aware of the same or chose to ignore them. Both ways, he has showed tremendous incompetence and should be taken to task for it. There is a famous saying that ignorance of law is not an excuse for committing a crime. This applies to the layman. But what is the remedy if a judge displays such ignorance of law and legal procedures?