oppn parties SC: Sec 148 Of NI Act Can Be Applied Retrospectively

News Snippets

  • University vice-chancellors in West Bengal decide not to hold final-year examinations despite UGC prod, will instead go by the state government advised 80-20 formula where 80% will be marked on performance in past semesters and 20% on internal assessments in the final semester
  • The Centre wants the ITI and other top Indian firms to bid for 5G as Chinese firms Huawei and ZTE are not likely to be allowed to participate
  • India and China agree on total disengagement to return to peace ahead of the next round of military talks
  • The Supreme Court allows delivery of summons and notices via WhatsApp and email, but questions remain on proof of actual receipt
  • National Investigation Agency says the proceeds from the Kerala gold smuggling case could have been used for terrorist activities
  • Four Maoists shot dead in Valmiki Tiger Reserve in Bihar
  • Despite localized lockdown, Covid cases continue to rise at an alarming rate in West Bengal. Newer areas brought under containment zones in Kolkata
  • ICSE, ISC results declared, Average scores in the English paper, 20% lower this year than the average in most years, pulls down the aggregate for most candidates
  • IIP contracts by 35% in May. Manufacturing goes down by 39.3%
  • Row erupts over CBSE's decision to reduce the syllabus by 30% this academic year due to the disruption caused by the pandemic. Experts say several lessons that the ruling dispensation does not like are being removed
  • Gangster Vikas Dubey's nephew killed in an encounter by UP police who also pick up his key aide Raju Khullar and his son Adarsh
  • MHA sets up an inter-ministerial committee to probe the alleged financial misdeeds of three trusts linked to the Gandhi family
  • Actor Jagdeep, most famous for his Soorma Bhopali act in Sholay, passes away
  • Pakistan says Kulbhushan Jadhav has declined to file a review petition and will stick to his mercy plea. India calls it a farce
  • India to keep a strict vigil to confirm that the Chinese are abiding by the deal on the pullback at the LAC
Gangster Vikas Dubey's 'encounter' raises several questions and the Yogi government is under fire for allegedly getting him killed in a 'staged' encounter to prevent the exposure of the nexus between criminals and the administration in the state
oppn parties
SC: Sec 148 Of NI Act Can Be Applied Retrospectively

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2019-06-01 20:43:32

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
The government had amended the Negotiable Instruments Act in 2018 to insert two new sections which provided for the drawer of a bounced cheque to pay interim compensation to the payee if the drawer pleaded not guilty of the charges (under sec. 143A) and on appeal, the appellate court was empowered to order deposit of an amount that was at least 20 percent of the fine or compensation imposed by the trial court (under sec. 148).

This was done, as the government said it had been “receiving several representations from the public including trading community relating to pendency of cheque dishonour cases. This is because of delay tactics of unscrupulous drawers of dishonoured cheques due to easy filing of appeals and obtaining stay on proceedings." The said amendments came into force on the first of September, 2018.

Since there were lakhs of cheque bouncing cases pending at that time, there was no clarity whether these two sections could be applied retrospectively. Now, the Supreme Court has ruled that sec. 148 can be applied with retrospective effect. In the case Surinder Singh Deswal @ Col. S.S. Deswal vs. Virender Gandhi, the question before the court was whether the section could be applied to cases where the accused were convicted before it came into force.

The court upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court order, which in turn had upheld the First Appellate Courts’ order directing the appellants/convicts to deposit 25% of the amount levied as fine/compensation by the trial court. The appellants had argued that since their conviction was confirmed before the amendment came into force, they were not liable to deposit the amount. But the apex court dismissed their plea. It said that “considering the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the amendment in Section 148 of the N.I. Act stated hereinabove, on purposive interpretation of Section 148 of the N.I. Act as amended, we are of the opinion that Section 148 of the N.I. Act as amended, shall be applicable in respect of the appeals against the order of conviction and sentence for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, even in a case where the criminal complaints for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act were filed prior to amendment Act No. 20/2018 i.e., prior to 01.09.2018. If such a purposive interpretation is not adopted, in that case, the object and purpose of amendment in Section 148 of the N.I. Act would be frustrated.”

As for section 143A, while the Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that it cannot be applied with retrospective effect, a Special Leave Petition is pending before the Supreme Court to decide on the subject. One feels that if the purpose of the legislation was to prevent unscrupulous drawers of cheques from prolonging the cases and harass the payees, then sec 143A should also be applied with retrospective effect in order to let the drawers prove their good intentions by paying interim compensation to the payee and then contesting the case.