oppn parties Shocking Judgment in a Mumbai POCSO Court

News Snippets

  • The government says Covid-19 is still in local transmission stage in India
  • Government scotches rumours of extending the lockdown beyond April14. Says no such plan
  • Centre asks states to give shelter and food to migrant workers to stop them from taking to the streets
  • RBI cuts repo rate by 75 bps, the steepest in 10 years
  • Centre writes to states regarding laxity in monitoring people who had arrived from abroad between January and March
  • Kerala reports a spurt in new cases
  • With 124 fresh cases on Friday, the number of reported cases in India stand at 854
  • Five of a family, including a 9-month-old-baby test positive for Covid-19 in Nadia district in West Bengal on Friday
  • The Pakistani army is reportedly forcibly moving all Covid-19 patients to PoK and Gilgit
  • Untimely azaans in J&K mosques spark panic gathering
  • Stocks rise - Sensex up by 1400 points and Nifty goes above the 8600 mark
  • Rahul Gandhi says the economic package is "the first step in the right direction"
  • The government announces wide-ranging measures to help the poor overcome the economic hardship caused by Covid-19
  • G20 leaders to hold a virtual meeting today to explore ways of fighting Covid-19 in a coordinated manner
  • The Delhi government orders testing of all medical staff after the positive test on a Delhi mohalla clinic doctor
Death toll reaches 27 as Covid-19 cases across India reach 974 on Saturday
oppn parties
Shocking Judgment in a Mumbai POCSO Court

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-01-19 19:57:39

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
It is strange how even judges designated in special courts to preside over a particular Act make errors of judgment. Judge S K S Rizvi of the special POCSO court in Mumbai has held that since a 15 and a half year old girl had deposed that she was in love with the accused and had eloped with him voluntarily; the accused need not be punished despite the fact that he had sexual intercourse with the girl.

The judge needs to be educated that the provisions of the act as they stand provide for stated punishment for the accused if he has any kind of penetrative sex with a girl below 18 years of age, even with her consent and active participation. The consent of the girl is immaterial as the Act has decreed that the age of consent in India is 18 and before that girls are presumed to be incapable of giving their consent for any sexual act.

Shockingly, Judge Rizvi said that the girl was of "understanding mind and had voluntarily gone with the accused at several places and had sexual intercourse with him and she also wanted to marry him". This shows that the judge has wrongly interpreted the provisions of the act. If 15 and half year old girls were considered of “understanding mind” wouldn’t the lawmakers have reduced the age of consent to 15 while drafting the POCSO Act?

POCSO Act has had a rough ride till now. Despite the Act providing strict timelines, cases are dragging on. Conviction rate is very low. A High Court judge has even questioned Sec 29 of the Act, saying that it needs to be discussed why the onus of proving his innocence should lie on the accused, turning earlier criminal jurisprudence – where an accused was presumed innocent till proved guilty – on its head.

One feels that while some NGO’s are doing excellent work in educating parents and children and even partnering with the police to spread awareness so that more people come forward to report sexual crimes against children, the judges also need to be educated about the thinking that went behind POCSO. They also need to be told that the provisions of the Act need to be applied with strictness if it is to be effective.