oppn parties Shocking Judgment in a Mumbai POCSO Court

News Snippets

  • Amit Shah says the government will identify and deport illegal immigrants from all parts of the country
  • Reports from Pakistan confirm that Hafiz Saeed has been arrested and sent to jail
  • After the SC order, Karnataka Speaker says he will go by the Constitution in deciding on the resignations of the 16 MLAs
  • Rebel MLAs say they will not attend the trust vote on Thursday
  • Supreme Court rules that rebel MLAs cannot be forced to attend the assembly and vote in the floor test
  • Both the Centre and the Assam government have sought re-verification of up to 20% of draft NRC data
  • Pakistan opens its airspace for Indian planes
  • Dilapidated building collapses in Mumbai, killing more than 10 people while many were still trapped
  • Kulbhushan Jadhav case verdict to be delivered today by the ICJ
  • A Vistara flight landed in Lucknow with just 5 to 10 minutes of fuel left in the tank
  • Supreme Court to decide on Karnataka MLAs plea today
  • Karnataka alliance to face floor test on Thursday
  • China says that the next Dalai Lama will be appointed by it
  • Pakistan assures India that no anti-India activity would be allowed in the Kartarpur corridor
  • Pakistan to allow visa-free access to 5000 pilgrims every day to undertake pilgrimage using the Kartarpur corridor
ISRO calls-off Chandrayaan-2 mission launch at last moment due to technical snags. revised date will be announced later
oppn parties
Shocking Judgment in a Mumbai POCSO Court

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
It is strange how even judges designated in special courts to preside over a particular Act make errors of judgment. Judge S K S Rizvi of the special POCSO court in Mumbai has held that since a 15 and a half year old girl had deposed that she was in love with the accused and had eloped with him voluntarily; the accused need not be punished despite the fact that he had sexual intercourse with the girl.

The judge needs to be educated that the provisions of the act as they stand provide for stated punishment for the accused if he has any kind of penetrative sex with a girl below 18 years of age, even with her consent and active participation. The consent of the girl is immaterial as the Act has decreed that the age of consent in India is 18 and before that girls are presumed to be incapable of giving their consent for any sexual act.

Shockingly, Judge Rizvi said that the girl was of "understanding mind and had voluntarily gone with the accused at several places and had sexual intercourse with him and she also wanted to marry him". This shows that the judge has wrongly interpreted the provisions of the act. If 15 and half year old girls were considered of “understanding mind” wouldn’t the lawmakers have reduced the age of consent to 15 while drafting the POCSO Act?

POCSO Act has had a rough ride till now. Despite the Act providing strict timelines, cases are dragging on. Conviction rate is very low. A High Court judge has even questioned Sec 29 of the Act, saying that it needs to be discussed why the onus of proving his innocence should lie on the accused, turning earlier criminal jurisprudence – where an accused was presumed innocent till proved guilty – on its head.

One feels that while some NGO’s are doing excellent work in educating parents and children and even partnering with the police to spread awareness so that more people come forward to report sexual crimes against children, the judges also need to be educated about the thinking that went behind POCSO. They also need to be told that the provisions of the Act need to be applied with strictness if it is to be effective.