oppn parties Shocking Judgment in a Mumbai POCSO Court

News Snippets

  • Mobile operators Vodafone-Idea and Airtel decide to raise tariffs from next month
  • Sharad Pawar meets Sonia Gandhi and says more time needed for government formation in Maharashtra
  • Justice S A Bobde sworn in as the 47th Chief Justice of India
  • Supreme Court holds hotels liable for theft of vehicle from their parking area if parked by valet, says "owner's risk" clause is not a shield from such liability
  • Finance Minister says she is receiving feedback from many sectors that recovery is happening as there is lower stress
  • Sabarimala temple opens, but police bar the entry of women below 50 years
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman says Air India and BPCL to be sold off by March
  • Media person Rajat Sharma resigns as DDCA president
  • Shiv Sena, NCP and Congress postpone meeting the governor of Maharashtra
  • Shiv Sena not to attend the NDA meeting on 17th November, says break up "a formality"
  • Shiv Sena says that the confidence the BJP is showing about forming the government in Maharashtra is based purely on its expectation of getting numbers through horse trading
  • Anil Ambani resigns as director of the bankrupt Reliance Communications
  • India beat Bangladesh by an innings and 150 rums inside three days in the first Test. Indian pacers excel after Mayank Agarwal's double century
  • Sena-NCP-Congress work out a common minimum programme, will form the government soon and it will last 5 years, says Sharad Pawar
  • Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upholds the decision to withdraw the charitable status of Young India, making it liable to pay Rs 145 in income tax. Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Vadra are the majority shareholders in the company
Two Muslim litigants in Ayodhya refuse to accept the Supreme Court order, say review petition might be filed
oppn parties
Shocking Judgment in a Mumbai POCSO Court

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
It is strange how even judges designated in special courts to preside over a particular Act make errors of judgment. Judge S K S Rizvi of the special POCSO court in Mumbai has held that since a 15 and a half year old girl had deposed that she was in love with the accused and had eloped with him voluntarily; the accused need not be punished despite the fact that he had sexual intercourse with the girl.

The judge needs to be educated that the provisions of the act as they stand provide for stated punishment for the accused if he has any kind of penetrative sex with a girl below 18 years of age, even with her consent and active participation. The consent of the girl is immaterial as the Act has decreed that the age of consent in India is 18 and before that girls are presumed to be incapable of giving their consent for any sexual act.

Shockingly, Judge Rizvi said that the girl was of "understanding mind and had voluntarily gone with the accused at several places and had sexual intercourse with him and she also wanted to marry him". This shows that the judge has wrongly interpreted the provisions of the act. If 15 and half year old girls were considered of “understanding mind” wouldn’t the lawmakers have reduced the age of consent to 15 while drafting the POCSO Act?

POCSO Act has had a rough ride till now. Despite the Act providing strict timelines, cases are dragging on. Conviction rate is very low. A High Court judge has even questioned Sec 29 of the Act, saying that it needs to be discussed why the onus of proving his innocence should lie on the accused, turning earlier criminal jurisprudence – where an accused was presumed innocent till proved guilty – on its head.

One feels that while some NGO’s are doing excellent work in educating parents and children and even partnering with the police to spread awareness so that more people come forward to report sexual crimes against children, the judges also need to be educated about the thinking that went behind POCSO. They also need to be told that the provisions of the Act need to be applied with strictness if it is to be effective.