oppn parties Spare The Bureaucrats In Political Slugfests

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
Spare The Bureaucrats In Political Slugfests

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2021-06-01 12:24:19

Before forming any opinion on la affaire Alapan Bandhopadhyay (the West Bengal chief secretary who is in the eye of a political storm) one needs to remember that Bandopadhyay was due to retire on 31st May and had been given a three month extension by the Centre just a few days before his retirement. One also needs to keep in mind that the extension must have been the result of a consultative process between the Centre and the state when the state must have asked for his services to be extended in view of the fact that the second wave of Covid-19 was raging and Bandopadhyay had been doing a good job in controlling the same in West Bengal. The Centre must have given him an extension on the request of the state.

Then, what changed in just a couple of days for the Centre to call him for Central deputation without consulting the state? Is it "political vendetta", as alleged by the state chief minister? Or is it disciplinary action against Bandopadhyay for not attending the meeting called by the Prime Minister when he visited West Bengal to get a first hand report on the situation arising out of the havoc caused by Cyclone Yaas? It needs to be remembered that an IAS officer, although working for the state government, is obliged to report also to the Prime Minister. By choosing to accompany the state chief minister (after she claimed to have taken the leave of the PM) and not staying back for a meeting with the PM, did Alapan Bandopadhyay commit a mistake that warranted the 'disciplinary' action? Bandopadhyay, meanwhile, chose not to report to the Centre and took superannuation. He was promptly appointed chief adviser to Mamata Banerjee for a period of three years.

While the controversy will rage on and people will take sides citing rules and propriety, the affair does just one thing - weakens an already weak bureaucracy. What do they do in situations such as the one that arose in West Bengal? It also shows the Centre in a bad light mainly because of the ongoing political fight between the PM and the TMC supremo. Was action against Bandopadhyay necessary, especially after the state chief minister claimed to have taken permission from the Prime Minister to leave with the chief secretary? If no permission was granted by the Prime Minister, he should say so in public. Bureaucrats must not be made pawns in the game of one-upmanship being played by politicians.