oppn parties State Dinner For President Trump: Government Ignores Traditions, Congress Sulks

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court asks journalists to be responsible and publish only the official version of news after it was brought to its notice that migrant exodus started after the 'fake' news that the lockdown will be extended to three months
  • Small saving rates slashed by the government by 140 basis points
  • The Centre says that the exodus of the migrants was stopped to save villages and prevent community transmission
  • The Centre says March 31 will remain the closing date for FY 2019-2020 and no change will be made for Covid-19 disruption
  • Tablighi Jamaat fiasco puts several states on high alert, attendees and their contacts being traced
  • Stock markets recover on the last day of the financial year, but the sentiment remains weak
  • The government says Covid-19 is still in local transmission stage in India
  • Government scotches rumours of extending the lockdown beyond April14. Says no such plan
  • Centre asks states to give shelter and food to migrant workers to stop them from taking to the streets
  • RBI cuts repo rate by 75 bps, the steepest in 10 years
  • Centre writes to states regarding laxity in monitoring people who had arrived from abroad between January and March
  • Kerala reports a spurt in new cases
  • With 124 fresh cases on Friday, the number of reported cases in India stand at 854
  • Five of a family, including a 9-month-old-baby test positive for Covid-19 in Nadia district in West Bengal on Friday
  • The Pakistani army is reportedly forcibly moving all Covid-19 patients to PoK and Gilgit
Total count crosses 1600 in India with 52 deaths and 146 recoveries on Tuesday, spurt in cases in Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu
oppn parties
State Dinner For President Trump: Government Ignores Traditions, Congress Sulks

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2020-02-25 17:29:41

Aggrieved by the fact that Sonia Gandhi has not been invited to the State dinner being hosted for visiting US President Donald Trump at the Rashtrapati Bhawan, the Congress has decided not to send any representatives to the event. Ghulam Nabi Azad, the leader of the Congress in the Rajya Sabha and Adhir Ranjan Choudhary, the leader in the Lok Sabha were invited but both have declined the invite. Former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh, who was invited late (there was no invitation until Sunday evening) has also declined the invitation and will not attend.

The Congress displeasure is also due to the fact that no meeting has been arranged by the government between Trump and the main opposition party, as has been the tradition with visiting dignitaries. The government is giving the impression that this is a visit where only the government will call the shots. But in a democracy, any visiting leader must be allowed to meet politicians across the spectrum. If the government did not want a Congress delegation to meet Trump for political reasons, it could have scheduled a meeting with an all-party delegation. The government might say that the US President was pressed for time as the operative part of the visit was just for a single day, but since all other meetings and events were organized, a meeting with the opposition parties was in order and would not have shown the government as disrespectful of traditions.

But the Congress is also in the wrong for boycotting the event. Dr. Singh, Azad and Choudhary should have attended the dinner under protest. A State dinner for a visiting president is not the time to settle political scores. It lowers the dignity of the event and the prestige of the nation for invitees not to attend purely due to any political grievance. The Congress trio should have made the most of the opportunity and should have interacted with Trump. One is sure he would have given time to Dr. Singh and he could have made him aware of the party's stand on issues. It would have earned a lot of brownie points for the Congress while showing the government in a bad light. But by choosing not to attend, the Congress has diluted the negative effects of the government's decisions.