By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-05-31 08:40:32
The Supreme
Court on Monday took up cudgels on behalf of junior lawyers when it
broached the subject before three senior lawyers. The court asked Kapil Sibal, Mukul
Rohatgi and A M Singhvi whether they should not be giving a chance to junior
lawyers to appear before vacation benches and argue cases. The answers provided
by these senior lawyers were revealing. Kapil Sibal said that there were "dharnas" outside his house, alluding that it was client pressure that forced him to
argue cases instead of assigning a junior. Mukul Rohatgi insisted on arguing
the case and the bench did not allow him to do so through video-conferencing
(he was not in Delhi) and the case was adjourned to a later date. AM Singhvi
said that this can be done only if the court makes a uniform rule that no
senior advocates would be allowed to appear before vacation benches. He also
suggested that the lawyer fraternity should have a self-rule and senior
advocates must exercise self-restraint.
Although
what the court suggested is good as otherwise junior lawyers do not get many
chances for practical experience of arguing before the court, Singhvi's
suggestion is also sensible. For, there is cut-throat competition and if a
senior lawyer deputes his junior in a particular case only to find that a
senior lawyer is arguing for the opposite party he or she risks the ire of the
client. There is immense pressure on senior lawyers from clients to personally
argue cases as they command exorbitant fees. Rightly or wrongly, clients feel
cheated if they find that a junior has been assigned to the case. But this is
something that the lawyers have to change. They have to educate the client that
preparing a case is teamwork and once the line of argument has been decided
upon, a junior can argue the case as effectively. Senior lawyers are mentors and
role-models and they must provide opportunities to their juniors to gain
practical experience. For this, they must convince their clients, have a
self-rule and exercise self-restraint as suggested by senior lawyer AM Singhvi.