oppn parties Supreme Court Intervenes In Farm Dispute

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Supreme Court Intervenes In Farm Dispute

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-12-16 11:04:59

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The Supreme Court has decided to form a committee to resolve the farm dispute. The said committee is to comprise of representatives from farm unions from all over India, representatives of the government and other stakeholders. It has issued notices to the Centre and the states in this regard. The apex court was hearing a bunch of petitions that sought a direction to the authorities to remove the agitating farmers from Delhi's borders as it violated the apex court's ruling in the Shaheen Bagh case.

The court was of the opinion that the farm issue would soon become a national issue and it seemed that the government's effort to convince the farmers about the efficacy of the new farm bills were not paying off and a resolution was not in sight. The court said that it would be better for a committee to discuss the matter and find a resolution.

This is what is required. This correspondent had suggested forming a committee in earlier articles on the subject because direct negotiation between warring parties often does not yield results. But since the farmers do not trust the government and independent experts were not coming forward to act as mediators, forming such a committee would have been difficult.

Hence, it is good that the apex court has started the process. The farm unions will perhaps agree to be a part of such a committee if it is set up by the court. They have already started deliberating on what the court has said.

The court must ensure that apart from the farm unions, government representatives and other stakeholders, outside experts in agriculture, public policy and legal matters also get a place in the committee. It must also lay down the process of discussion and maybe mandate that the bills be discussed clause by clause to better understand the objections of the farmers.

A negotiated settlement, overseen by the Supreme Court, would ensure that no one plays spoilsport and reforms are initiated in the agriculture sector without compromising the interests of the farmers.