oppn parties Supreme Court Must Scrap Section 124A

News Snippets

  • Sikh extremists attacked a cinema hall in London that was playing Kangana Ranaut's controversial film 'Emergency'
  • A Delhi court directed the investigating agencies to senstize officers to collect nail clippings, fingernail scrappings or finger swab in order to get DNA profile as direct evidence of sexual attack is often not present and might result in an offender going scot free
  • Uniform Civil Code rules cleared by state cabinet, likely to be implemented in the next 10 days
  • Supreme Court reiterates that there is no point in arresting the accused after the chargesheet has been filed and the investigation is complete
  • Kolkata court sentences Sanjoy Roy, the sole accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case, to life term. West Bengal government and CBI to appeal in HC for the death penalty
  • Supreme Court stays criminal defamation case against Rahul Gandhi for his remarks against home minister Amit Shah in Jharkhand during the AICC plenary session
  • Government reviews import basket to align it with the policies of the Trump administration
  • NCLT orders liquidation of GoAir airlines
  • Archery - Indian archers bagged 2 silver in Nimes Archery tournament in France
  • Stocks make impressive gain on Monday - Sensex adds 454 points to 77073 and Nifty 141 points to 23344
  • D Gukesh draws with Fabiano Caruana in the Tata Steel chess tournament in the Netherlands
  • Women's U-19 T20 WC - In a stunning game, debutants Nigeria beat New Zealand by 2 runs
  • Rohit Sharma to play under Ajinkye Rahane in Mumbai's Ranji match against J&K
  • Virat Kohli to play in Delhi's last group Ranji trophy match against Saurashtra. This will be his first Ranji match in 12 years
  • The toll in the Rajouri mystery illness case rose to 17 even as the Centre sent a team to study the situation
Calling the case not 'rarest of rare', a court in Kolkata sentenced Sanjay Roy, the only accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case to life in prison until death
oppn parties
Supreme Court Must Scrap Section 124A

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-04-28 14:24:11

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The case to decide the constitutional validity of Section 124A (commonly known as the sedition law) is being heard for long and the Supreme Court rightly put its foot down on Wednesday when it informed the government that it would not give any more time and will pronounce its judgment after a final hearing on May 5. This is good as the Centre seems to have nothing substantive to add to what it has already submitted in court regarding the section otherwise it would have done so by now.

Back in July last year, during one of the hearings in the case, the Centre had submitted that the apex court may issue "mitigating guidelines" for the proper use of the section. But the apex court had already done that, in a way, in the Kedar Nath judgment in 1962. It had then said that an "intention" and "tendency" to cause public disorder and endanger state security must exist for the section to apply.

But since then, the misuse of the section has increased manifold. It is being used to crush freedom of speech just because what is being spoken or written is not music to the ears of the ruling dispensation. The very existence of the section in the statute books makes it a potent weapon for use against dissenters and the government becomes the sole authority to decide what constitutes sedition, now even on the complaint of a private citizen. The section uses terms which are not clearly defined, are open to misuse and are being misused. The offence is cognizable and non-bailable.

It is clear that no purpose will be served if the Supreme Court issues "mitigating guidelines". The section will be continued to be misused even after that as it has been misused after the Kedar Nath judgment. A law introduced by a subjugator (the British Empire) to quell dissent and jail freedom fighters has no place in modern India and the Supreme Court must strike it down.