oppn parties Freedom To Spew Hate Not Part Of Freedom of Expression

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Freedom To Spew Hate Not Part Of Freedom of Expression

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2025-06-27 10:09:30

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The link between free speech and democracy has long been considered sacred. A thriving democracy depends on the ability of its citizens to speak freely, question authority, and express dissent without fear. But this essential freedom is under serious threat - in India and across the world.

In today's world, the attack on free speech takes new and dangerous forms. While outright censorship and silencing of dissent continue, a worrying trend has also emerged: hate speech is now being disguised as free speech. Polarising voices often use the shield of constitutional rights to spread divisive and inflammatory messages, especially during politically sensitive periods like elections.

The Supreme Court of India, in a recent and significant intervention, made it clear that the right to free speech does not include the right to hate speech. The court was responding to an unusual case where four state police forces attempted to arrest a man who had helped bring attention to a communal social media post following the Pahalgam terror attack. The court's response - stopping the arrest - highlighted the irony of punishing someone who stood up for social harmony, rather than the one who spread hatred.

Such incidents are not isolated. According to India Hate Lab, a global research organisation, anti-minority hate speech in India jumped by 74% in 2024, coinciding with the general election. This spike underlines how communal rhetoric is increasingly being used as a political tool, often under the guise of free expression.

In this new landscape, those who defend free speech - journalists, judges, civil society, and concerned citizens - must respond with greater urgency and adaptability. The tools and arguments used to protect speech must evolve. They must also ensure that the same protections are not misused to fuel hatred.

Ultimately, the fate of free speech is closely tied to the fate of democracy itself. When one is weakened, the other suffers. As democracies retreat across the globe, the pressure on free speech grows. Upholding this right - with all its necessary limits - is not just about protecting words. It is about protecting the very idea of democratic life.