oppn parties Supreme Court Rejects 'Blind' Opposition To EVMs

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Supreme Court Rejects 'Blind' Opposition To EVMs

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2024-04-27 14:13:43

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

It is strange that political parties across the spectrum raise questions about EVMs when they lose. The fact is if EVMs were so easy to manipulate, then the NDA would not have lost a single election after coming to power in 2014. Or for that matter, the UPA would not have lost in 2014. Although the NDA is accused of manipulating EVMs for winning, no critic has ever explained how they have lost so many state elections after 2014.

The Supreme Court has rightly questioned this blind opposition to EVMs without supporting data or evidence. This is after the Election Commission has organized several hackathons to assure people about the safety of the voting machines. A return to paper ballot, as the apex court rightly said, would be turning the clock back and ignoring technology that has served the purpose well and without proven blemishes. Clearly, those who petitioned the court to step in and ban EVMs could not make out a strong case against them.

As for political parties, will AAP explain how it keeps winning in Delhi or how it won in Punjab if the EVMs can be manipulated to throw up predetermined results? Or will the Congress explain how it won in Karnataka and Himachal recently and in Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and other states after 2014? Or can the TMC explain why it keeps winning assembly elections in Bengal? If EVMs could be manipulated and if the BJP under Narendra Modi, as alleged, is bent on wiping out the opposition, it would not have allowed these parties to win a single state election post 2014.

In fact, paper ballots were the very basis for goondaism in the voting system. Party cadres used to stuff ballot boxes with ballot papers stamped by them. Ballot boxes were stolen and replaced after all ballot papers inside were also replaced. EVMs offer a transparent and honest voting system and those who doubt their fairness must present data as evidence before making such wild allegations. The Supreme Court has done well to back the Election Commission and the EVMs.