oppn parties Supreme Court Right In Rejecting Pleas To Hear The Hijab Case

News Snippets

  • Allahabad HC said that the UP Police is acting as law unto themselves as they detained a person unlawfully even before his arrest
  • Kolkata witnesses traffic snarls on the first day of the Durga Puja festival as revellers start pnadal-hopping
  • Neha Bora was subsequently released and Dipke is to appear before a magistrate today at noon
  • Delhi Police detained Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke, Neha Bora of AISA, student leaders and supporters ahead of a rally in Connaught Place demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's resignation. The protest followed the detention and jailing of two CJP leaders earlier in the week over demonstrations at Jantar Mantar
  • The Reserve Bank of India is considering further monetary tightening to counter capital outflows and increase the cost of betting against the rupee, according to bankers and analysts cited by Reuters. The measures follow recent rate increases and steps to drain liquidity as pressure on the currency and inflation concerns persist
  • India directed oil marketing companies to stop diverting sugar-based feedstocks for ethanol production in the 2026–27 supply year, according to a new tender issued on Friday. The companies have invited bids for 11 billion litres of ethanol made from alternatives including corn and broken rice, amid concerns about domestic sugar supplies and prices
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said India's trade imbalance with China was growing sharply and attributed the problem partly to restrictions on Indian goods and services entering the Chinese market. China subsequently said it was ready to work with India to address mutual economic and trade concerns; India's trade deficit with China reached $69 billion in the first half of FY2026–27, up 27% year-on-year
  • Indian equity benchmarks extended their recovery on Friday, with the Sensex rising 413.66 points to close at 74,729.27 and the Nifty 50 gaining 148.80 points to settle at 23,146.15. Information technology shares, including Tech Mahindra, Infosys and TCS, helped lift the indices
  • India defeated Zimbabwe by four wickets in the opening women's T20 International in Raipur, taking a 1–0 lead in the three-match series. Deepti Sharma and Niki Prasad combined in an 82-run stand after India's top order collapsed, helping the hosts chase down Zimbabwe's total of 114 for five
  • Indian wrestler Komal won bronze in the women's 59 kg category at the Under-23 World Wrestling Championships in Las Vegas, defeating Kazakhstan's Viktoriia Khusainova 7–2. Fellow Indian Amruta Pujari advanced to the women's 72 kg final after recording two pinfall victories
  • Indian shuttler Jagsher Singh Khangurra secured a bronze medal at the BWF World Junior Badminton Championships in Cairo
  • The Supreme Court of India upheld the Bombay High Court's decision quashing the 2020 write-off of ₹8,415 crore in additional tier-1 bonds issued by Yes Bank (Yes Bank). The court ruled that the bank's administrator lacked the authority to extinguish the bonds under the final reconstruction scheme, strengthening bondholders' claims
  • The Supreme Court issued notices to the Election Commission of India, Delhi Police and opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi and Akhilesh Yadav, in separate petitions concerning electoral-roll revision and protests held in Delhi on October 10–12. The court also directed the preservation of CCTV footage linked to allegations of police excesses
  • The Supreme Court ruled that a person converting from Hinduism to Islam cannot automatically claim backward-class reservation benefits in the new religious community solely on the basis of their previous caste status. The judgment upheld the Madras High Court's decision striking down a 2024 Tamil Nadu government order that permitted such certification for specified communities
  • The Election Commission of India ordered a Special Summary Revision of electoral rolls in 14 states and three Union Territories, using January 1, 2027, as the qualifying date for voter eligibility. The draft rolls are scheduled for publication on November 12, claims and objections will be accepted until December 11, and the final rolls are due on January 4, 2027
Delhi HC refuses to ban CJP's Tiranga rally at Central Park in Connaught Place today /////// Police says will control and regulate it /////// NDMC closes the park for the public on Friday and Saturday
oppn parties
Supreme Court Right In Rejecting Pleas To Hear The Hijab Case

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-02-12 07:28:27

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The Supreme Court is right in rejecting multiple pleas on successive days asking for its intervention in the hijab row. Since a full bench of the Karnataka High Court is hearing the matter, it would be improper for the apex court to intervene at this juncture. Important questions of constitutional significance and personal law are being debated before the high court bench and it is not right for plaintiffs to rush to the Supreme Court now.

The judiciary functions in a set manner. Being a constitutional court, the high court of the jurisdiction is the first court where such matters should be heard. The matter will reach the Supreme Court only after the high court has pronounced its verdict and aggrieved parties prefer an appeal before the apex court or if the court takes it up on its own. It would be judicial impropriety for the Supreme Court to intervene now.

The Supreme Court took pains to request the plaintiffs not to "push these issues to a larger level". It said it was watching what is happening and asked the parties not to make it "communal or political and let the HC decide the constitutional question". The apex court said that "we are duty-bound to protect the constitutional rights of every individual, irrespective of the community or religious denomination she/he belonged to."

Whatever the importance or urgency of the matter, plaintiffs must not rush to the Supreme Court in the first instance. They must first approach the high court of their jurisdiction. Approaching the top court for everything is not proper. It also shows a lack of faith in the high court. Lawyers advising the plaintiffs must recognize this. Matters will reach the apex court as per due process. Since the Supreme Court is always aware of matters of importance and is increasingly using the suo moto route to intervene where it thinks, the rights of the citizens will be protected.