oppn parties Supreme Court Says Haldwani Squatters Cannot Be Removed By Brute Force

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court allows a raped minor to end her 30-week pregnancy
  • Mamata Banerjee calls Calcutta HC order in teacher appointment "illegal" and "one-sided", state government to file appeal in Supreme Court
  • Calcutta HC scraps TM|C government's 2016 process of appointing school teachers, 25757 teachers set to lose their jobs and asked to return their salaries
  • Congress tells EC to disqualify PM Modi for his speech saying Muslims will be the biggest beneficiaries of Congress' redistribution of wealth, alleges Modi trying to inflame passions and create enmity between communities
  • NCLT admits Indiabulls' plea against insolvency proceedins against Subhash Chnadra, the founder and chairman emeritus of Zee Enterprises
  • Vodafone FPO oversubscribed by 7 times, becomes the biggest such fund-raise
  • RBI tells payment companies to track dubious transactions that may be used to influence voters
  • RIL profit stood at Rs 21243cr in Q4 FY23 even as revenue rose by 11% to Rs 2.4 lakh cr
  • Stocks remain positive on Monday: Sensex gains 560 points to 73648 and Nifty 189 points to 22336
  • IPL: Rajasthan Royals on fire, beat Mumbai Indians by 9 wickets as Sandeep Sharma takes 5 for 18 and Yashasvi Jaiswal roares back to form with a brilliant century
  • IPL: Gujarat Titans beat Punjab Kings by 7 wickets
  • IPL: KKR beat RCB by 1 run in a last-ball thriller in the heat chamber of Kolkata's Eden Garden with temperatures soaring above 40 degrees
  • Candidates Chess: D Gukesh emerges winner. Draws last match with Hikaru Nakamura to end at 9 points. Former tournament leader Ian Nepomniachtchi also draws with Fabioano Caruana to leave Gukesh as the sole leader and winner to challenge Ding Liren
  • Supreme Court says all cases of mob violence and lynchings should not be given a communal angle
  • Supreme Court tells petitioners who want elections to be held with ballot papers as they fear EVM tampering to back their claims of tampering with data
Calcutta HC scraps 2016 teacher appointment process, 25757 teachers to lose their jobs, ordered to repay salaries withdrawn in 4 weeks
oppn parties
Supreme Court Says Haldwani Squatters Cannot Be Removed By Brute Force

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2023-01-07 06:24:18

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

With a huge number of migrants and homeless people in cities and towns, encroachment of government land is a serious problem in India. Huge tracts of land owned by the government or government-owned entities (and even privately-owned land in some places) have been occupied by illegal settlers all over the country. But, as the Supreme Court rightly pointed out in the case of Haldwani squatters on railways land, people who have made it their home for more than 40 years cannot be "uprooted overnight". The Supreme Court has always held that while illegal encroachment cannot be automatically legalized, the squatters cannot also be removed arbitrarily.

There is no doubt that what the squatters have done is illegal and discriminates against others who are homeless but if they have occupied the space and have been living there for decades (having identity and address proof documents issued by government authorities bearing the address of the plot, and in some cases even lease or title deeds) without any action on part of the authorities, it is inhumane and unfair to tell them to pack up and go.

To understand the problem, we have to examine the modus operandi under which such land is 'grabbed'. No one can build even a temporary structure, let alone grab a piece of land and build a permanent house on it, without the active connivance of the political and administrative class. The former does it for creating a vote bank and the latter to their bidding and make some money on the side. Even a hawker setting up a roadside stall will be made to pay a lump sum amount and then daily or monthly 'fee' to be able to do business.

Hence, more than the squatters, it is those who give them protection or sell them dreams in the form of lease or ownership deeds or identity and address-proof documents or the 'right' to illegally occupy public space are at fault. Although things have now improved and the government and government-owned entities take good care of their land and do not allow squatters, the Supreme Court is right in saying that a humane solution needs to be found and using brute force to evict the squatters cannot be allowed.