oppn parties Tariff Barriers: Return To Protectionism?

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Tariff Barriers: Return To Protectionism?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-12-21 10:50:47

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The Centre has proposed to raise import duties on non-essential items. There can be no argument over this. If Indians can live without some non-essential, luxury items but are yet willing to import them they should be ready to pay a higher price for them. But the dispute is over the definition of non-essential. In the latest proposal, non-essential items have been sought to be defined as items for which "adequate domestic manufacturing capacity" exists. In other words, if an item is being produced in India and if it is being produced in quantities sufficient enough to address the demand for that item, than for the purpose of the latest proposal that item will be considered non-essential and imports of such items will carry a higher import duty.

The government proposes to identify such 'non-essential' items through a 'granular' assessment by individual ministries who will then make a list of items that are being manufactured in the country but are still being imported. It will not be assessed whether these items manufactured in India are of the same quality or value. Just the fact that they are being produced in India and still being imported will be enough for the imported items to carry higher duty.

If the idea is to protect domestic industry by higher import tariffs then this move is not good. There are two parallel ideas being promoted by the government. The first is Make in India and the second is Atmanirbhar Bharat. Both have noble intent. But if tariff barriers are erected, it will work to our disadvantage. The country should only produce items which it can do best and at the optimum cost. It will then be competitive and will be able to export those items. Items which it cannot produce well (in terms of quality and pricing) should be allowed to be imported.  Make in India will only succeed when we work on our strengths and true atmanirbhata is not in being self-reliant in all things but in things which we can produce well and export to the world. The rest we can import at lower costs. We can then divert the capital and infrastructure used for making these 'non-essential' items to more productive uses. That would work to the best of our advantage. It has to be admitted that no country in the world will ever be able to produce all it needs locally. That is why import barriers, except in cases of obvious dumping by other countries, are disadvantageous for global trade.