oppn parties Tariff Barriers: Return To Protectionism?

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
Tariff Barriers: Return To Protectionism?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-12-21 10:50:47

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The Centre has proposed to raise import duties on non-essential items. There can be no argument over this. If Indians can live without some non-essential, luxury items but are yet willing to import them they should be ready to pay a higher price for them. But the dispute is over the definition of non-essential. In the latest proposal, non-essential items have been sought to be defined as items for which "adequate domestic manufacturing capacity" exists. In other words, if an item is being produced in India and if it is being produced in quantities sufficient enough to address the demand for that item, than for the purpose of the latest proposal that item will be considered non-essential and imports of such items will carry a higher import duty.

The government proposes to identify such 'non-essential' items through a 'granular' assessment by individual ministries who will then make a list of items that are being manufactured in the country but are still being imported. It will not be assessed whether these items manufactured in India are of the same quality or value. Just the fact that they are being produced in India and still being imported will be enough for the imported items to carry higher duty.

If the idea is to protect domestic industry by higher import tariffs then this move is not good. There are two parallel ideas being promoted by the government. The first is Make in India and the second is Atmanirbhar Bharat. Both have noble intent. But if tariff barriers are erected, it will work to our disadvantage. The country should only produce items which it can do best and at the optimum cost. It will then be competitive and will be able to export those items. Items which it cannot produce well (in terms of quality and pricing) should be allowed to be imported.  Make in India will only succeed when we work on our strengths and true atmanirbhata is not in being self-reliant in all things but in things which we can produce well and export to the world. The rest we can import at lower costs. We can then divert the capital and infrastructure used for making these 'non-essential' items to more productive uses. That would work to the best of our advantage. It has to be admitted that no country in the world will ever be able to produce all it needs locally. That is why import barriers, except in cases of obvious dumping by other countries, are disadvantageous for global trade.