oppn parties The Congress Must Steer Clear Of Such Retrograde Ideas

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
The Congress Must Steer Clear Of Such Retrograde Ideas

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2024-04-26 15:35:58

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

Sam Pitroda, the chairman of the Indian Overseas Congress, would not have had the courage to call for the reintroduction of the inheritance tax (or estate duty) if he had not got the cue from Rahul Gandhi's promise to carry out a comprehensive (which he called historic) survey to find out who holds the country's wealth and then take revolutionary measures (which, given the tone and tenor of Gandhi's recent speeches, meant redistribution of such wealth).

But aren't Gandhi and Pitroda flogging a dead horse and giving political opponents a stick to beat them in this election season? Already, PM Modi has said that the Congress wants to loot the dead too.

Talking about reviving a tax that was abolished in 1985 by Rajiv Gandhi is retrograde - apart from being bad economics and worse politics. The tax yielded a pittance and the cost of collecting it was more than what the government got. That was one of the strongest reasons to abolish it, apart from the fact that the then finance minister, V P Singh, said that the tax had failed to meet its objectives.

There is no doubt that people will rightly start raising concerns (and there is nothing urban Naxal about it) when too much of the nation's wealth is concentrated in the hands of too few, as is happening in India now. The richest 1% in the country holds more than 40% of the nation's wealth. This glaring inequality sends people scouting for measures to reduce it or redistribute the wealth. But the tried and failed inheritance tax is not one of them.

The debate over redistribution of wealth is important (even the Supreme Court is seized of the matter) and needs better inputs than the reintroduction of estate duty or inheritance tax. Although the Congress has rightly distanced itself from Pitroda's remarks, it has done little to provide any constructive view other than talking about 'revolutionary' measures. This has left it open to criticism and the BJP is using it to its advantage. The Congress should take forward the excellent work it did in opening up the economy in the 1990s and also stick to the mission of simplifying the tax structure as outlined in its manifesto by steering clear of such ambiguous and retrograde ideas.