oppn parties The Debbie Abrahams Episode Could Have Been Handled Better

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court asks journalists to be responsible and publish only the official version of news after it was brought to its notice that migrant exodus started after the 'fake' news that the lockdown will be extended to three months
  • Small saving rates slashed by the government by 140 basis points
  • The Centre says that the exodus of the migrants was stopped to save villages and prevent community transmission
  • The Centre says March 31 will remain the closing date for FY 2019-2020 and no change will be made for Covid-19 disruption
  • Tablighi Jamaat fiasco puts several states on high alert, attendees and their contacts being traced
  • Stock markets recover on the last day of the financial year, but the sentiment remains weak
  • The government says Covid-19 is still in local transmission stage in India
  • Government scotches rumours of extending the lockdown beyond April14. Says no such plan
  • Centre asks states to give shelter and food to migrant workers to stop them from taking to the streets
  • RBI cuts repo rate by 75 bps, the steepest in 10 years
  • Centre writes to states regarding laxity in monitoring people who had arrived from abroad between January and March
  • Kerala reports a spurt in new cases
  • With 124 fresh cases on Friday, the number of reported cases in India stand at 854
  • Five of a family, including a 9-month-old-baby test positive for Covid-19 in Nadia district in West Bengal on Friday
  • The Pakistani army is reportedly forcibly moving all Covid-19 patients to PoK and Gilgit
Total count crosses 1600 in India with 52 deaths and 146 recoveries on Tuesday, spurt in cases in Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu
oppn parties
The Debbie Abrahams Episode Could Have Been Handled Better

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2020-02-20 12:51:45

The government made a mess of handling the Debbie Abrahams issue, allowing her to escalate the matter and ensure a lot of negative publicity both for the government and the Kashmir issue. No one can dispute the fact that every country has the right to refuse entry to any person it does not want to enter its country. The visa regime has been put in place for that very reason. But there are norms and procedures that must be followed and last-minute denials smack of high-handedness. Having said that, the way Abrahams made travel plans just days after the visa was canceled also raises questions about her intentions, especially since the visa was issued in October 2019.

Abrahams had applied for a business visa (which entitled her to multiple entries into India for a period of one year) a few months back. By then, she had already been in the limelight as a vocal critic of India's Kashmir policy subsequent to the clampdown in the state and the abrogation of Article 370. Why then was her application approved? That was the biggest mistake. Abrahams should have been denied a visa to let her know that she was not welcome in India. But once her visa was approved, it was natural for her to plan a trip to the country.

What subsequently happened at Delhi airport was a textbook case of how visitors should never be treated. Since Abrahams was a member of the UK parliament, chairperson of the UK's All-Party Parliamentary Group on Kashmir and a critic of the policies of the present Indian government, extra care should have been taken in her case. She says nobody in charge could explain to her why her visa had been canceled. But was the Delhi airport the right place for asking such questions? If Abrahams had genuine concerns about the cancellation, she should have sought answers from the Indian High Commission in London after being intimated about the fact. Abrahams has denied receiving a cancellation notice before coming to India but the government has unofficially shown a letter that was sent to her. 

It was clear that she was denied entry for her role in toeing the Pakistani line on Kashmir and her frequent criticism of India over human rights violations in J&K. The government has admitted that Abrahams' visa was canceled as she was involved in "anti-India activities". It was canceled three days prior to her arrival at Delhi airport. The Indian High Commission charged her of traveling to India on an invalid visa as she had prior knowledge that her visa had been canceled. Abrahams said she wanted a visa on arrival but her request was denied. She alleged that the government deported her for her criticism over policies on Kashmir.

If the government had wanted, it could have avoided the ugliness that the episode generated. It could have had a senior officer in place to explain things to her and make her leave respectfully. It also seems that Abrahams was bent on getting publicity since she traveled despite knowing her visa had been canceled. The very fact that she did not travel to India from October 2019 when her visa was approved till February 2020 when it was canceled points to mala fide intentions. She achieved her purpose of portraying the Indian government as insensitive and intolerant of criticism by coming on an invalid visa and getting deported after creating sound and fury at the airport. It is the government of India that lost face, which could have been avoided with a little more finesse and tactful handling of the issue.