oppn parties The Farm Sector Reforms cannot Be Kept Pending

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
The Farm Sector Reforms cannot Be Kept Pending

By A Special Correspondent
First publised on 2022-07-22 09:08:28

It is doubtful whether the panel the Centre has formed eight months after repealing the farm laws following the agitation by farmers would achieve anything. One says this because of several things. Firstly, the panel has too many members and is headed by a bureaucrat who was in charge when the laws were introduced; negotiations took place with farm bodies and even when they were finally rolled back. The government can argue that he is best placed to head the panel as he knows all that went into the making of the laws. But the problem is that since the laws were rejected by the farm bodies and led to a prolonged agitation after which they were scrapped, appointing him has probably lead to trust deficit. That brings us to the next problem. The government had invited the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM), the main body that spearheaded the agitation, to nominate three members to the panel but they unfortunately declined to do so.

Maybe that was because of the composition of the panel, its terms of reference and the fact that it will not explore the possibility of making MSP legal, which was one of the main demands of the SKM. The government has said that the panel has been formed to examine how the process of providing MSP for crops could be made more robust. But it has also saddled the panel with the task of finding out better ways to promote natural farming, crop diversification and micro irrigation, among other things. But the farm unions should have participated in the deliberations of the panel to give their inputs. That would have been good for the overall reform of the farm sector.

It would have been better if the government had formed a panel to examine the ways to make the scrapped farm laws better because there is no doubt that the farm sector needs good laws to expand the market and reduce its reliance on MSP and procurement by the government. The laws that were enacted were brought in with long term reforms in mind but the government could not convince the stakeholders. The need is to tweak the laws as per the feedback received and bring all political parties and stakeholders on board to bring in new laws to transform the farm sector.