The Government Notified The Electoral Bonds Scheme Despite Objections From The EC & The RBI
Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
View all posts by this Author
By Sunil Garodia
About the Author
Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
View all posts by this Author
The electoral bonds are once more in the news. An RTI activist has taken pains to bring out information for a scheme that was devised to provide donors with a shield of anonymity. Acting on that, the Association of Democratic Reforms (ADR) has filed a fresh application seeking a stay on the scheme. It needs reminding that the earlier application for a stay filed by ADR in 2017 is still pending. The ADR said the need for a fresh application arose after the new revelations.
The efforts of the activist yielded the information that the Election Commission (EC) had objected when the government wanted to introduce the electoral bonds scheme by objecting to the amendments to the Finance Act, 2017. Even the RBI had objected to the scheme. But the government overrode all objections to notify the scheme. An analysis by the ADR shows that electoral bonds worth Rs 6128cr have been sold in the period between March 2018 and October 2019. Of this, the major part, or 78%, or Rs 4794, was sold between January and May 2019. The BJP received 95% of the funding through this route.
The only reason that one can think for the government's continued insistence that the electoral bonds in their present form are transparent and a big electoral reform is that the BJP is the biggest beneficiary of such funding at present. Otherwise, any instrument that is sold payable to bearer without disclosing the name of the payer can never be transparent. The government harps on the fact that since the bonds can only be purchased through banking channels, they cannot be purchased with black money. Hence, they will reduce the use of black money in elections.
But the government is ignoring the fact that if the name of the donor is not disclosed and if it is only known to the party receiving the funds, it opens the doors for corruption and quid pro quo. At present, political parties have to disclose the name of all donors who donate above Rs 20000 in cash or any amount by cheque. If a company donates Rs 2cr to any party, the party will have to disclose the name of the company to the Election Commission while the company will have to disclose the name of the party in its balance sheet. But if the donation is made through electoral bonds, the party will disclose it got the amount and the company will disclose that it paid the amount. But the party will not disclose the company's name and the company will not disclose the party's name. Is this transparency? Is this reform? Or is this invitation for quid pro quo?
image courtesy: modified from an image at ADR website
