oppn parties The Government Should Not Object To Saurabh Kirpal's Elevation

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
The Government Should Not Object To Saurabh Kirpal's Elevation

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2021-11-17 06:38:30

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

It is heartening and welcome that the Supreme Court collegium has finally decided to recommend Saurabh Kirpal's name for elevation as a judge to the Delhi High Court after taking it up four times in the last four years and not arriving at a decision. That Kirpal is a gay was a factor for the indecision on part of the collegium, which was perhaps also guided by the Centre's objection to his name as his partner is a foreign national.

But societal mores and legal position have both changed in these four years. The Supreme Court has decriminalized same-sex relationships and society has also, although grudgingly and not in totality, come to accept such relationships. Hence, having a gay judge should not, in normal course, matter so much now unless regressive thinking leads decision-makers to prevent a qualified and deserving person to reach a higher level just because they do not consider his sexual preferences to be 'normal'.

Then, the question of his partner being a foreign national, although a point of concern, should not be a disqualifying point if the background check and intelligence inputs are perfect. All foreign nationals are not spies or have vested interests and partners do not normally influence work decisions. Or is the objection only because Saurabh Kirpal has a "partner" as opposed to a foreign national spouse?

If Saurabh Kirpal's work justifies his elevation as a high court judge, and if the background check does not throw up negative points, nothing else should matter, least of all his sexual preferences and his choice of partner. Since the collegium has recommended his name, the government should not object after satisfying itself about the "security risk". If Saurabh Kirpal is elevated, it will be a milestone in the history of the Indian queer rights movement.