oppn parties The Gyanvapi Order: Doors Opened For Another Protracted Legal Battle

News Snippets

  • Coal exploration plan worth Rs 2980cr cleared by Union cabinet
  • Government ploughs in Rs 89000cr in BSNL for 4G, 5G spectrum operations
  • Stocks gain on Wednesday: Sensex adds 350 points to 63142 and Nifty 127 points to 18726
  • Wresters agitation: Sports minister assures action by June 15, wrestlers put off agitation till then
  • WTC Final: India lose the plot after putting Australia to bat as Steve Smith stands like a rock and Travis Head counter attacks to put Australia (327 for 3) in command on the first day
  • Wrestlers agitation: Bajrang Punia. Sakshi Mallik and Vinesh Phogat rejoin work in Railways, BKU pulls back but wrestlers say agitation will go on
  • UP bahubali-turned-politician gets life in 32-year-old murder case
  • India-US seal defence cooperation roadmap as Defence minister Rajnath Singh meets US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin
  • CBI probe in the train mishap will look at error in interlocking system and probe the sabotage angle
  • Violence continues in Manipur as three persons were killed after a mob attacked an ambulance in Imphal West district
  • Karnataka cabinet is likely to discuss cow slaugther law in its next meeting
  • Rahul Gandhi woos diaspora in the US, tries to show the fight in India as between those who believe in Mahatma Gandhi and those in Nathuram Godse
  • In preparation of a shutdown, MTNL moving operations to BSNL
  • Services sector sustains growth although Services PMI slips from 62 in April to 61.2 in May
  • Stocks gain handsomely on Monday: Sensex rises 240 points to 62787 and Nifty 59 points to 18593
WTC Final: Australia take firm grip on Day1 - Travis Head (146 batting) and Steve Smith (95 batting) take them to 327 for 3 as Indian bowling falters
oppn parties
The Gyanvapi Order: Doors Opened For Another Protracted Legal Battle

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-09-13 03:48:50

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The order passed by Varanasi District Judge A K Vishvesha saying that the petition praying for daily worshipping rights at Shringar Gauri and other visible and invisible deities inside the Gyanvapi complex was maintainable and hearing will continue in the case is likely to have far reaching effects, in this case and in other cases involving disputes in mandir-masjid complexes. For one, this order is likely to open the road for a protracted legal battle that is likely to reach the Supreme Court and will also disturb the harmony on the ground.

While deciding on the maintainability the petition, the honourable court junked the three main objections of the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee (AIMC), the body that control the complex. The court ruled that the petition was not barred under the Places of Worship Act as the petitioners were not claiming ownership of the complex nor were they asking to convert it into a temple. Since they were just demanding extension of worshipping rights, it would not, according to the court, amount to changing the character of the place of worship as decreed under the said Act.

It also said that since the petitioners were not Muslims and the Waqf Act had nothing to do with the request for praying rights in a Waqf property, the AIMC argument that the Waqf tribunal in Lucknow was the competent body to decide on the issue was also not correct. The court also ruled that the petition was also not barred under the UP Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act as the said act did not bar worshipping the idols placed within the 'endowments' of the temple complex. The court said that the petition was maintainable and that the case would be heard. The Muslim side said it would appeal against the judgment in the Allahabad High Court.

This order by the Varanasi District Court clearly shows that the Places of Worship Act, 1991, although designed to prevent such disputes, is open to various interpretations and there will be conflicting judgments by the lower judiciary in such matters. Hence, it is important that the Supreme Court take up the issue of the constitutional validity on the Places of Worship Act fast. For, it is that decision and the guidelines that the Supreme Court might issue in that order that will guide the lower judiciary in these matters. Otherwise, conflicting orders will create trouble on the ground.