oppn parties The Gyanvapi Order: Doors Opened For Another Protracted Legal Battle

News Snippets

  • PFI's political wing, the SDPI is on EC radar and action will follow soon if discrepancies are detected
  • Ashok Gehlot to meet Sonia Gandhi today, says all issues will be sorted out soon
  • Referring to the PFI ban, most Muslim organizations ask the government to take similar action against right wings organizations like the RSS, Bajrang Dal, VHP and the like
  • The banned Popular Front of India has said that it has dissolved all its units and abides by the decision of the government
  • Calcutta HC directed all illegal appointees in government schools (in the SSC scam) to resign by November 7 or face punishment
  • Senior advocate R Venkataramani has been appointed the next Attorney General after incumbent K K Venugopal's term ends on september 30
  • Calcutta HC says the Duare (doorstep) ration scheme of Bengal government is illegal
  • Vodafone-Idea warned by tower companies to clear dues or face blocking of signals from November
  • Rupee ends at 81.94 per dollar
  • Stocks tumble again on Wednesday: Sensex loses 509 points to 56598 and Nifty 148 points to 16858
  • India beats South Africa by 8 wickets in the first T20, Bowlers restrict the Africans to just 106 and then K L Rahul and Suryakumar Yadav take India home. Kolhi fails again
  • Another round of raids was conducted across India against the PFI: 250 persons were arrested
  • The National Medical Commission had issued guidelines that hair transplants will henceforth be done only in proper hostipals by trained RMPs and not in the thousandsof hair clinics that are mushrooming all over the country
  • This years' Dadasaheb Phalke award will be conferred upon Asha Parekh
  • In a setback to the Uddhav Thackeray faction, the Supreme Court left it to the Election Commission to decide which faction was the 'real' Shiv Sena
In a landmark order, Supreme Court rules that all women, married or unmarried, are entitled to safe and legal abortion up to 24 weeks of pregnancy as per the MTP Act
oppn parties
The Gyanvapi Order: Doors Opened For Another Protracted Legal Battle

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-09-13 03:48:50

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

The order passed by Varanasi District Judge A K Vishvesha saying that the petition praying for daily worshipping rights at Shringar Gauri and other visible and invisible deities inside the Gyanvapi complex was maintainable and hearing will continue in the case is likely to have far reaching effects, in this case and in other cases involving disputes in mandir-masjid complexes. For one, this order is likely to open the road for a protracted legal battle that is likely to reach the Supreme Court and will also disturb the harmony on the ground.

While deciding on the maintainability the petition, the honourable court junked the three main objections of the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee (AIMC), the body that control the complex. The court ruled that the petition was not barred under the Places of Worship Act as the petitioners were not claiming ownership of the complex nor were they asking to convert it into a temple. Since they were just demanding extension of worshipping rights, it would not, according to the court, amount to changing the character of the place of worship as decreed under the said Act.

It also said that since the petitioners were not Muslims and the Waqf Act had nothing to do with the request for praying rights in a Waqf property, the AIMC argument that the Waqf tribunal in Lucknow was the competent body to decide on the issue was also not correct. The court also ruled that the petition was also not barred under the UP Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act as the said act did not bar worshipping the idols placed within the 'endowments' of the temple complex. The court said that the petition was maintainable and that the case would be heard. The Muslim side said it would appeal against the judgment in the Allahabad High Court.

This order by the Varanasi District Court clearly shows that the Places of Worship Act, 1991, although designed to prevent such disputes, is open to various interpretations and there will be conflicting judgments by the lower judiciary in such matters. Hence, it is important that the Supreme Court take up the issue of the constitutional validity on the Places of Worship Act fast. For, it is that decision and the guidelines that the Supreme Court might issue in that order that will guide the lower judiciary in these matters. Otherwise, conflicting orders will create trouble on the ground.