oppn parties The Prashant Bhushan Case: Strange Reluctance To Sentence The Offender

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court questions the continuing relevance of two-child norms. The Court observed that falling fertility rates have weakened the population-control rationale behind laws disqualifying people with more than two children from contesting local body elections. It referred the issue to a larger Bench for consideration
  • Supreme Court declines to shift Tirupati laddu case outside Andhra Pradesh. The Court rejected a plea seeking transfer of the trial, despite arguments that political statements by Andhra Pradesh's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister could affect the fairness of proceedings
  • Supreme Court transfers Azam Khan's fresh ED bail plea to Allahabad High Court. The apex court declined to consider the Samajwadi Party leader's bail request in a fresh Enforcement Directorate case and directed that it be listed before a division Bench of the High Court on November 16
  • Two killed in Delhi building collapse; contractor booked. Two bodies were recovered after a building collapsed in Chawri Bazaar. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the contractor had been booked and the concerned junior and assistant engineers suspended
  • Uttar Pradesh voter rolls show a 2.4-crore discrepancy. A difference of approximately 2.4 crore names has been reported between the state's panchayat and rural Assembly voter lists. The Election Commission has ordered the two sets of rolls to be matched
  • Gujarat announces 3% dearness allowance hike. The state government announced a three-percentage-point increase in dearness allowance for government employees and pensioners ahead of Diwali
  • Sensex and Nifty post their strongest single-day gains in months. The Sensex surged 2,008.61 points, or 2.60%, to close at 79,310.01, while the Nifty 50 climbed 576 points, or 2.40%, to 24,536.60. Financial and automobile stocks led the rally, supported by falling crude prices and renewed foreign investor buying
  • Maaya Rajeshwaran reaches WTA-level quarter-final. The 17-year-old Indian defeated Poland's Weronika Falkowska 6-4, 6-3, becoming the first Indian woman since Sania Mirza in 2012 to reach a quarter-final at a WTA Tour-level singles event
  • Tanvi Patri reaches Youth Olympics badminton final. The 15-year-old defeated Japan's Yuzuno Watanabe in the semi-final, assuring India of a medal and becoming the first Indian badminton player to reach the girls' singles final at the Youth Olympics
  • India beat Pakistan 3-2 in SAFF Championship. India defeated Pakistan in a closely contested match, having led 3-0 before conceding two late goals. The victory was reported as a significant result for India's second-string side
  • India beat Japan 4-1 to win a record sixth Asian Champions Trophy. India recovered from an early deficit to defeat Japan in the final at Mohali, extending its record as the tournament's most successful men's team
  • The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre and the Election Commission on a petition challenging Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, which grants the CEC and Election Commissioners protection from legal proceedings for acts performed in their official duties. The petition argues that such blanket immunity could leave citizens without an effective remedy for alleged wrongdoing by the Commission
  • The Supreme Court told voters whose names were deleted from Delhi's draft electoral rolls not to be apprehensive about seeking re-enrolment through Form 6, after the Election Commission assured it that such applicants would not be prosecuted merely because their names had appeared in earlier rolls
  • Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opened the party's campaign for the 2027 Punjab Assembly elections with an Insaaf rally in Sangrur, Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district, accusing the AAP government of failing to control drugs, gangster violence and corruption. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge outlined six commitments, including a drug-free Punjab, protection of farmers, employment for young people and action against corruption
  • Rahul Gandhi accused the AAP government of running Punjab through a remote control from Delhi and questioned Bhagwant Mann's ability to tackle drug abuse, making personal allegations about the Chief Minister's conduct during their time together in Parliament
Stock markets on fire due to US results, Sensex gains 2008 points to reach its highest level in 8 months
oppn parties
The Prashant Bhushan Case: Strange Reluctance To Sentence The Offender

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-08-26 08:22:24

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

It is strange that the Supreme Court is dilly-dallying in punishing Prashant Bhushan for contempt of court. One is saying this because if the court did not have any qualms in finding him guilty of the offence, it should logically not have reservations in handing out the punishment too.

It makes a mockery of justice if the court finds someone guilty of an offence and first allows him time to apologize and then when the offender refuses to do so, says that it expected a different statement from him and proceeds to ask the top lawyers present in court what punishment should it prescribe for him.

Did the court ask anyone before taking suo moto cognizance of his offending tweets? Or before finding him guilty? Then why should it ask about the quantum of punishment. It is upon the court to decide what it considers the optimum punishment for an offence of this nature.

The court has landed itself in an unenviable position by holding Bhushan guilty for contempt. It finds that if it punishes Bhushan too harshly, he will become a martyr and a hero for being the person who stood up to the court and did not let his convictions waver. That will further undermine the authority of the court. If it lets him go with just a warning, the original purpose of taking suo moto cognizance of his tweets to establish the authority and maintain the dignity of the court will not be served.

As the court has said, Bhushan's response to its appeal to him to reconsider his stand was even more derogatory. Then why hesitate in punishing him? If a person says that his conscience does not allow him to offer an insincere apology and if the court has already found him guilty, the matter should end with the court sentencing him as it thinks fit.

At the end of one of the most unusual days of hearings in the Supreme Court, the bench finally reserved the verdict on the quantum of sentence. This means that despite the arguments, pontifications and homilies presented in the court during the day, the judges could not make up their minds about how Bhushan should be punished and left it for another day.