oppn parties The Prashant Bhushan Case: Strange Reluctance To Sentence The Offender

News Snippets

  • Sikh extremists attacked a cinema hall in London that was playing Kangana Ranaut's controversial film 'Emergency'
  • A Delhi court directed the investigating agencies to senstize officers to collect nail clippings, fingernail scrappings or finger swab in order to get DNA profile as direct evidence of sexual attack is often not present and might result in an offender going scot free
  • Uniform Civil Code rules cleared by state cabinet, likely to be implemented in the next 10 days
  • Supreme Court reiterates that there is no point in arresting the accused after the chargesheet has been filed and the investigation is complete
  • Kolkata court sentences Sanjoy Roy, the sole accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case, to life term. West Bengal government and CBI to appeal in HC for the death penalty
  • Supreme Court stays criminal defamation case against Rahul Gandhi for his remarks against home minister Amit Shah in Jharkhand during the AICC plenary session
  • Government reviews import basket to align it with the policies of the Trump administration
  • NCLT orders liquidation of GoAir airlines
  • Archery - Indian archers bagged 2 silver in Nimes Archery tournament in France
  • Stocks make impressive gain on Monday - Sensex adds 454 points to 77073 and Nifty 141 points to 23344
  • D Gukesh draws with Fabiano Caruana in the Tata Steel chess tournament in the Netherlands
  • Women's U-19 T20 WC - In a stunning game, debutants Nigeria beat New Zealand by 2 runs
  • Rohit Sharma to play under Ajinkye Rahane in Mumbai's Ranji match against J&K
  • Virat Kohli to play in Delhi's last group Ranji trophy match against Saurashtra. This will be his first Ranji match in 12 years
  • The toll in the Rajouri mystery illness case rose to 17 even as the Centre sent a team to study the situation
Calling the case not 'rarest of rare', a court in Kolkata sentenced Sanjay Roy, the only accused in the R G Kar rape-murder case to life in prison until death
oppn parties
The Prashant Bhushan Case: Strange Reluctance To Sentence The Offender

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-08-26 08:22:24

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

It is strange that the Supreme Court is dilly-dallying in punishing Prashant Bhushan for contempt of court. One is saying this because if the court did not have any qualms in finding him guilty of the offence, it should logically not have reservations in handing out the punishment too.

It makes a mockery of justice if the court finds someone guilty of an offence and first allows him time to apologize and then when the offender refuses to do so, says that it expected a different statement from him and proceeds to ask the top lawyers present in court what punishment should it prescribe for him.

Did the court ask anyone before taking suo moto cognizance of his offending tweets? Or before finding him guilty? Then why should it ask about the quantum of punishment. It is upon the court to decide what it considers the optimum punishment for an offence of this nature.

The court has landed itself in an unenviable position by holding Bhushan guilty for contempt. It finds that if it punishes Bhushan too harshly, he will become a martyr and a hero for being the person who stood up to the court and did not let his convictions waver. That will further undermine the authority of the court. If it lets him go with just a warning, the original purpose of taking suo moto cognizance of his tweets to establish the authority and maintain the dignity of the court will not be served.

As the court has said, Bhushan's response to its appeal to him to reconsider his stand was even more derogatory. Then why hesitate in punishing him? If a person says that his conscience does not allow him to offer an insincere apology and if the court has already found him guilty, the matter should end with the court sentencing him as it thinks fit.

At the end of one of the most unusual days of hearings in the Supreme Court, the bench finally reserved the verdict on the quantum of sentence. This means that despite the arguments, pontifications and homilies presented in the court during the day, the judges could not make up their minds about how Bhushan should be punished and left it for another day.