oppn parties To Avoid Delays And Multiplicity, Allahabad HC To Hear All Krishna Janmabhoomi Cases

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
To Avoid Delays And Multiplicity, Allahabad HC To Hear All Krishna Janmabhoomi Cases

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2023-07-24 01:22:41

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

The Committee of Management Trust Shahi Idgah Masjid approached the Supreme Court to challenge the order of the Allahabad High Court that had referred to itself all the 16 suits pending before the civil court n Mathura on the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Masjid dispute. Its main contention was that by consolidating the cases and choosing to transfer them to the high court, the court was depriving the appellants the opportunity of two appeals. In ordinary course, if the matter was heard by the civil court, any order passed by that court could have been challenged in the Mathura district court and likewise the district court order in the Allahabad HC. The committee contended that the matter should move as per judicial hierarchy and it should have the right to appeal each order in the manner set forth by law.

But the Supreme Court was of the view that such cases move at a snail's pace in lower courts and history (probably the court was referring to the Ram Janmabhhomi-Babri Masjid case without taking names) has shown that delay in such matters causes disquiet one way or the other. It also said that multiplicity (16 suits are pending in the matter) of suits is not desirable in the same matter as it often leads to delays and prolongation of the case. It held that the application of mind should be at the high court stage and the Allahabad HC should adjudicate on the matter, including deciding on the preliminary objection to the maintainability of the suits.

While the committee is not wrong in asking for the case to move as per judicial hierarchy as it will afford it opportunity to challenge the orders in successive higher courts, the Supreme Court is also right in recognizing the potential mischief that can happen if the case drags on for years in the lower courts. The nation had seen how the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case went on for years (during which period the Masjid was brought down and a shilanyas was performed and passions were inflamed every few months leading to disturbed relations between the Hindus and the Muslims). But if the Allahabad HC hears all suits in a consolidated manner, applies its mind and delivers a verdict that can only be challenged in the Supreme Court, the case can be decided within a much shorter time span and chances for mischief will also be reduced.