oppn parties Unnecessary Squabbling Between Pillars of Democracy

News Snippets

  • Centre asks states to give shelter and food to migrant workers to stop them from taking to the streets
  • RBI cuts repo rate by 75 bps, the steepest in 10 years
  • Centre writes to states regarding laxity in monitoring people who had arrived from abroad between January and March
  • Kerala reports a spurt in new cases
  • With 124 fresh cases on Friday, the number of reported cases in India stand at 854
  • Five of a family, including a 9-month-old-baby test positive for Covid-19 in Nadia district in West Bengal on Friday
  • The Pakistani army is reportedly forcibly moving all Covid-19 patients to PoK and Gilgit
  • Untimely azaans in J&K mosques spark panic gathering
  • Stocks rise - Sensex up by 1400 points and Nifty goes above the 8600 mark
  • Rahul Gandhi says the economic package is "the first step in the right direction"
  • The government announces wide-ranging measures to help the poor overcome the economic hardship caused by Covid-19
  • G20 leaders to hold a virtual meeting today to explore ways of fighting Covid-19 in a coordinated manner
  • The Delhi government orders testing of all medical staff after the positive test on a Delhi mohalla clinic doctor
  • As a fallout of a Delhi mohalla clinic doctor testing positive for Covid-19, 900 people in the chain quarantined
  • China offers help to India in the fight against Covid-19 and says India will win the battle at an early date
Death toll reaches 27 as Covid-19 cases across India reach 974 on Saturday
oppn parties
Unnecessary Squabbling Between Pillars of Democracy

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2017-11-29 12:32:58

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
Debate is the backbone of democracy and when there is debate then there will be difference of opinion. The consensus emerging from taking into account various threads of thought is what makes for a robust society. But there is a time and place for airing one’s opinions. The way two pillars of democracy – the executive and the judiciary - faced-off during the National Law Day celebrations in New Delhi was embarrassing, to say the least. The judicial fraternity was out there in force and we had the Union law minister openly accusing the judiciary of meddling in what he thought was the exclusive domain of the legislature and the executive.

The government is piqued that the judiciary entertains too many PILs and pronounces judgments which nullify legislation. It accuses the judiciary of overreach. But aren’t PILs borne out of the government’s inability to enforce and apply the given laws efficiently? The legislature makes laws which the executive is expected to apply and enforce. If citizens are aggrieved, they approach the judiciary for redress. In normal circumstances, a citizen has to be directly affected by a law to file a case in court. But what happens when a law is not applied or applied incorrectly and it adversely affects a large number of citizens? It is then that activist lawyers and civil society activists petition the court to change the situation through a correct interpretation of law.

Since the judiciary is there to interpret the laws, it cannot out rightly reject PILs. There is a mechanism to filter out frivolous PILs. Still, most of the PILs that do get admitted are not to the liking of the government in power as most often they are against its shortcomings or unnecessary interference in the lives of citizens. This is not to say that there is no judicial overreach. The ways of the judiciary are strange – banning liquor vends, making singing of national anthem in cinema halls to cite a few examples – and very often such decisions are seen as making laws instead of interpreting them.

All three pillars of democracy need to develop a healthy respect for each other. The government has to apply and enforce laws equitably. It has to maintain law and order. Additionally, it has to redress the grievances of citizens as and when they surface with patience and compassion. Highhandedness often results in alienating the citizens and then filing of PILs. The courts would be amiss in their duty if they do not entertain PILs aimed at redressing the grievances of citizens. The legislature, on its part, needs to review old laws and rectify their lacunae and draft new laws after taking into consideration the concerns of citizens. If all wings do their work with diligence and with a respect for the work of other wings then there will be lesser problems of encroaching on each others’ turf.