oppn parties What Is The Remedy Against Legislative Or Executive Overreach?

News Snippets

  • SP drops two candidates owing allegiance to Azam Khan from Rampur and Moradabad
  • In Assam, a controversy erupted after a picture of UPPL leader Benjamin Basumatary, lying on a stack of Rs 500 notes circulated on social media. UPPL is an ally of the BJP
  • AAP's Jalandhar-West MP Sushil Kumar Rinku joins the BJP. He was the only AAP Lok Sabha MP
  • Supreme Court dismisses Centre's plea to review its 2023 verdict in the PMLA case
  • Close save for passengers as they remain unhurt after the wings of two planes graze at Kolkata airport. Pilots derostered and inquiry ordered by DGCA
  • Bengal BJP leader Dilip Ghosh gets notice from the EC as well as the BJP for making ugly remarks about Mamata Banerjee's parentage
  • Sadanand Vasanth Date, who faught terrorists in the 26/11 attack and was awarded the Preisent's Police medal, has been appointed the head of the NIA
  • Centre will borrow Rs 7.5L cr in the first six months of FY25, nearly 50% of the target for the full year
  • 25 stocks, including SBI, will see same day trade settlements from today in the world's fastest settlement mode in both BSE and NSE
  • Stocks recover smartly on Wednesday: Sensex rises 526 points to 72996 and Nifty 118 points to 22123
  • Tennis: Rohan Bopanna-Matthew Ebden reached the semifinals of the Miami Open
  • IPL: records tumble as SRH beat MI in a high-scoring match. SRH score 277/3 with 18 sixes and Mumbai score 246 with 20 sixes to fall short by 31 runs. Atotal of 38 sixes, highest in an IPL match were hit and both teams combined to score 523 runs, the highest aggregate in an IPL match
  • Amul will launch fresh milk in the US
  • IPL: RCB beat Punjab by 4 wickets as Kohli and Karthik shine with the bat
  • India strongly objected to German foreign office remarks over the arrest of delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal, called it "biased assumptions"
Delhi Lt Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena says government cannot be run from jail, hints at President's Rule in the capital ////// In a dangerous incident, the wings of two planes grazed while taxiing on the runway at Kolkata airport, all passengers were safe but DGCA ordered an inquiry and the pilots were derostered
oppn parties
What Is The Remedy Against Legislative Or Executive Overreach?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-11-30 15:58:34

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

Vice President Venkaiah Naidu, speaking on the theme of "harmonious relations between the legislature, the executive and the judiciary" at the All India Presiding Officers Conference at Kevadia in Gujarat a few days ago, pointed out certain cases of "judicial overreach" which he said was disrespectful to the "jurisdictional sanctity enshrined in the Constitution".  Pointing out the judiciary's intervention in the banning of firecrackers on Diwali and appropriating the process of appointment of judges to itself, Naidu said that such decisions have resulted in "avoidable blurring of contours demarcated by the Constitution".

Even as Naidu spoke about these judgments, the Bombay High Court slammed the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, and by extension the MVA government in Maharashtra, for illegally demolishing a private citizen's house in an action which it said was mala fide. One has pointed out this incident as it is the most recent example of executive overreach, so to say, against which the citizen has recourse only in a court of law. One can cite hundreds of other such instances of executive overreach. 

The fathers of the Indian constitution had demarcated the contours in such a way that none of those who impacted the lives of the ordinary citizen could crush him or her under their weight. Taking the above as an example, the Shiv Sena might allege judicial overreach on part of the Bombay HC, but the fact is that the court was only pointing out that the state (or its agency) had subverted the law to cause grief to a citizen. Who else to rectify the same but the courts?

At other times, the legislature enacts laws which are blatantly unconstitutional and trample upon the rights of the citizens. Section 66A of the IT Act was one such law. Section 118A of the Kerala Police Act (mercifully withdrawn before it was hauled up for judicial scrutiny) is a recent example. Such legislative overreach is regular and it is the judiciary which provides relief to the citizens by examining these sections for constitutional validity.

It is very easy to lambast the judiciary by citing selected verdicts but the fact is all three arms of governance are guilty of overreach and each tries to subvert the jurisdictional sanctity when it suits them or if they think they can get away with it. It is here where the demarcation works and keeps the system going. The executive or the legislature might feel aggrieved with the judiciary at times but they must keep in mind that the role of the judiciary is that of being the constitutional watchdog. It has to ensure that the other two arms of government do not violate the constitution and deny the rights which the citizens are entitled to. This is not to deny that the judiciary is not guilty of overreach. But there are inbuilt checks (like appealing to a higher court, a larger bench or even a full constitutional bench of the Supreme Court for contentious matters) in the judiciary to rectify the same.