oppn parties A Sociology Textbook That Finds Merits In Dowry

News Snippets

  • PFI's political wing, the SDPI is on EC radar and action will follow soon if discrepancies are detected
  • Ashok Gehlot to meet Sonia Gandhi today, says all issues will be sorted out soon
  • Referring to the PFI ban, most Muslim organizations ask the government to take similar action against right wings organizations like the RSS, Bajrang Dal, VHP and the like
  • The banned Popular Front of India has said that it has dissolved all its units and abides by the decision of the government
  • Calcutta HC directed all illegal appointees in government schools (in the SSC scam) to resign by November 7 or face punishment
  • Senior advocate R Venkataramani has been appointed the next Attorney General after incumbent K K Venugopal's term ends on september 30
  • Calcutta HC says the Duare (doorstep) ration scheme of Bengal government is illegal
  • Vodafone-Idea warned by tower companies to clear dues or face blocking of signals from November
  • Rupee ends at 81.94 per dollar
  • Stocks tumble again on Wednesday: Sensex loses 509 points to 56598 and Nifty 148 points to 16858
  • India beats South Africa by 8 wickets in the first T20, Bowlers restrict the Africans to just 106 and then K L Rahul and Suryakumar Yadav take India home. Kolhi fails again
  • Another round of raids was conducted across India against the PFI: 250 persons were arrested
  • The National Medical Commission had issued guidelines that hair transplants will henceforth be done only in proper hostipals by trained RMPs and not in the thousandsof hair clinics that are mushrooming all over the country
  • This years' Dadasaheb Phalke award will be conferred upon Asha Parekh
  • In a setback to the Uddhav Thackeray faction, the Supreme Court left it to the Election Commission to decide which faction was the 'real' Shiv Sena
In a landmark order, Supreme Court rules that all women, married or unmarried, are entitled to safe and legal abortion up to 24 weeks of pregnancy as per the MTP Act
oppn parties
A Sociology Textbook That Finds Merits In Dowry

By Anukriti Roy
First publised on 2022-04-04 16:31:01

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Anukriti is a student who dabbles in writing when she finds time.

Did you know that the dowry system has "merits and advantages"? Apparently, there are many advantages of adhering to a system that has been criminalized in India (although dowry is still demanded in various ways and also given silently) according to a textbook that is part of the BSc curriculum for nurses. The Textbook on Sociology for Nurses, written by T K Indrani has a list of such merits and advantages of the dowry system and Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi has flagged the issue in a letter to the Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

The book says that an indirect advantage of the system is that due to demands for dowry "many parents have started educating their girls. When the girls are educated or even employed, the demand for dowry will be less." So according to the author, the parents would have kept their girls uneducated if there were grooms willing to marry them without dowry. What kind of thinking is that? And the horror is that it is being taught to the next generation of Indians.

Another 'gem' in the book says that due to the fact that parents of some "ugly girls" are willing to pay "attractive dowry", they get married to "well or ugly looking boys". In short, the boys are 'bought' with the lure of money. The author also does not define who is 'ugly' according to him, or for that matter who is 'well looking'. What the book does not explain is what happens when the "well or ugly looking boys" keep up the demand and start harassing the girl and her family for more after the marriage. Also, what happens if the boy abandons her after marriage as she is 'ugly'?

Dowry is a reprehensible thing and it is a crime to demand or pay it India. Yet there are many sympathizers of the system. But how can one teach the merits and advantages of a system that has been criminalized?  How can the author hold such regressive views? How was the book passed in the first case? Is there no system of vetting texts? Currently in India, we have a ruling dispensation that is vetting history textbooks when the need is to vet such textbooks that propagate and hold a brief for such outlawed, outdated and dangerous ideas.