oppn parties A Tragedy That Could Have Been Averted

News Snippets

  • PFI's political wing, the SDPI is on EC radar and action will follow soon if discrepancies are detected
  • Ashok Gehlot to meet Sonia Gandhi today, says all issues will be sorted out soon
  • Referring to the PFI ban, most Muslim organizations ask the government to take similar action against right wings organizations like the RSS, Bajrang Dal, VHP and the like
  • The banned Popular Front of India has said that it has dissolved all its units and abides by the decision of the government
  • Calcutta HC directed all illegal appointees in government schools (in the SSC scam) to resign by November 7 or face punishment
  • Senior advocate R Venkataramani has been appointed the next Attorney General after incumbent K K Venugopal's term ends on september 30
  • Calcutta HC says the Duare (doorstep) ration scheme of Bengal government is illegal
  • Vodafone-Idea warned by tower companies to clear dues or face blocking of signals from November
  • Rupee ends at 81.94 per dollar
  • Stocks tumble again on Wednesday: Sensex loses 509 points to 56598 and Nifty 148 points to 16858
  • India beats South Africa by 8 wickets in the first T20, Bowlers restrict the Africans to just 106 and then K L Rahul and Suryakumar Yadav take India home. Kolhi fails again
  • Another round of raids was conducted across India against the PFI: 250 persons were arrested
  • The National Medical Commission had issued guidelines that hair transplants will henceforth be done only in proper hostipals by trained RMPs and not in the thousandsof hair clinics that are mushrooming all over the country
  • This years' Dadasaheb Phalke award will be conferred upon Asha Parekh
  • In a setback to the Uddhav Thackeray faction, the Supreme Court left it to the Election Commission to decide which faction was the 'real' Shiv Sena
In a landmark order, Supreme Court rules that all women, married or unmarried, are entitled to safe and legal abortion up to 24 weeks of pregnancy as per the MTP Act
oppn parties
A Tragedy That Could Have Been Averted

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-09-17 05:00:10

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The tragic death of a man whose 17-year-old son was fighting the system and the laws for permission to donate his liver to his critically-ill father shows how laws are not respected by authorities and how the delays in the judicial system work against the right to life and liberty.

The Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 prohibits minors from donating organs or tissues. But the Act was amended in 2011 to allow minors to donate under justifiable reasons. The boy had petitioned authorities in UP and Delhi to allow him to donate his liver to his father as he would have died otherwise. The reasons were justifiable as he was the only relative who had a perfect medical match. But his pleas went unheeded.

Hence, he was forced to approach the Supreme Court. While the apex court showed urgency in asking the UP administration to examine whether the boy was medically fit to donate, one feels that the court erred in not invoking Article 142 of the Constitution to do complete justice in the case by ordering that the doctors should take his liver and do the transplantation.

One is sure that since the medical tests to find the match had already been done and the boy's liver was a perfect match, there was no need to go through with the tests again. Considering the urgency of the matter, the apex court could have ordered an immediate transplantation.

Also, since the Transplantation Act had been amended to allow minors to donate with justifiable reasons, it defies logic that the health department in UP and Delhi did not allow the minor son to donate. A life was lost unnecessarily as there were chances that the father would have survived if the procedure was carried out in time.

There have been cases earlier too when minor children had approached courts to be allowed to donate an organ to their parents. Hence, the Supreme Court must issues clear and binding guidelines in this matter so that lives are not lost because the state administrations either do not understand the law or take too much time in arriving at a decision.