oppn parties Aadhar: What Is Normal Prudence And How Will An Ordinary Citizen Exercise It?

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Aadhar: What Is Normal Prudence And How Will An Ordinary Citizen Exercise It?

By Our Editorial Team
First publised on 2022-05-31 07:07:01

About the Author

Sunil Garodia The India Commentary view

UIDAI issued an advisory for people to use masked (which displayed just the last four digits of their Aadhar number) Aadhar when they were asked to submit the same. The Central government stepped in to cancel that advisory and instead asked citizens to observe "normal prudence" when giving photocopies of their Aadhar card. How is an ordinary citizen expected to know what is "normal prudence"? This flip-flop has caused more confusion in the minds of the people.

With everyone - starting from dealers of mobile companies for giving out new connections to hotels at the time of checking in - demanding photocopies of Aadhar card from citizens, there is no way a person can avoid disclosing the number which has the potential of being misused and harming his or her privacy. While the Supreme Court had ordered that private entities cannot demand Aadhar as proof of identity or address from citizens, the Centre had issued an ordinance to nullify the effect of that order. That had opened the doors for all private agencies to demand Aadhar photocopies from citizens even when their purpose could be solved with other identification documents.

But with privacy concerns refusing to go away and laws in India not stringent enough to prevent misuse of data collected by private agencies (a data protection law is still not in place despite a lot of discussion and a draft being ready), there has to be some way to prevent any and everyone from demanding Aadhar photocopies. Although checks exist in the Aadhar system to prevent violation of privacy (for instance, one can lock biometrics), it is not known to most and hence not effective. The present flip-flop is not good as it fails to provide any clarity on the issue. Since the problem of misuse and violation of privacy is real, the government must come about with an advisory about who can demand Aadhar photocopies from citizens. All others must be advised to be satisfied with other identification documents like PAN cards, Voter ID cards or driving licence, among others.