oppn parties Adultery Should Be Decriminalized

News Snippets

  • Amit Shah says the government will identify and deport illegal immigrants from all parts of the country
  • Reports from Pakistan confirm that Hafiz Saeed has been arrested and sent to jail
  • After the SC order, Karnataka Speaker says he will go by the Constitution in deciding on the resignations of the 16 MLAs
  • Rebel MLAs say they will not attend the trust vote on Thursday
  • Supreme Court rules that rebel MLAs cannot be forced to attend the assembly and vote in the floor test
  • Both the Centre and the Assam government have sought re-verification of up to 20% of draft NRC data
  • Pakistan opens its airspace for Indian planes
  • Dilapidated building collapses in Mumbai, killing more than 10 people while many were still trapped
  • Kulbhushan Jadhav case verdict to be delivered today by the ICJ
  • A Vistara flight landed in Lucknow with just 5 to 10 minutes of fuel left in the tank
  • Supreme Court to decide on Karnataka MLAs plea today
  • Karnataka alliance to face floor test on Thursday
  • China says that the next Dalai Lama will be appointed by it
  • Pakistan assures India that no anti-India activity would be allowed in the Kartarpur corridor
  • Pakistan to allow visa-free access to 5000 pilgrims every day to undertake pilgrimage using the Kartarpur corridor
ISRO calls-off Chandrayaan-2 mission launch at last moment due to technical snags. revised date will be announced later
oppn parties
Adultery Should Be Decriminalized

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
If the Supreme Court, which is hearing a PIL on the adultery law, just makes it gender-neutral without decriminalizing it, it would not be moving with the times. There should not be any criminality involved in a sexual call taken by two consenting adults. If they, or either of them, are married, it can at best be a breach of contract between the respective spouses and should be a ground for divorce. But to expect a man or a woman to bear with a sexless or loveless marriage and not satisfy biological urges outside is to demand too much and to punish them for it is heartless. To treat marriage as a divine bond and put morality in it ignores the fact that denial of sex, which is termed as a case of mental cruelty by courts, by either of the spouses is already a ground for divorce. In 2015, the Supreme Court had ruled so in the case Vidhya Vishwanathan vs Karthik Balakrishnan. In 2012, the Delhi High Court had said that “marriage without sex will be an insipid relation” while granting divorce to a man on the same grounds.

The government has argued before the court that the law be made gender-neutral. This means that instead of only the husband being allowed to lodge a case against his wife’s paramour as the law stands now, the wife should also be allowed to lodge the same against her husband’s lover. While this will prevent men from treating their wives as their property and make the law gender-neutral, the question remains that why should only one person be charged in an act that involves two equally ‘guilty’ persons. Shouldn’t the husband file a case against both his wife and her lover? Likewise, shouldn’t the wife charge both her husband and his lover? Shouldn’t the punishment be the same for both of them? If the spouses are allowed to charge only the person who has sex with their partners, it is assumed that their partners were not at fault which clearly is not the case. Hence, if the law is not decriminalized, then if a case is to be filed, it should be against both the parties.

Ideally the law should be decriminalized putting adultery in the civil domain, to be used as a tool for proving infidelity and breach of trust in order to get a divorce. A marriage cannot be saved by asking the spouses to lodge a case against their partners’ lovers. If there has been a breach, it means something was amiss between the spouses. It cannot be set right by punishing the so-called “other” man or woman.

pic courtesy: golegal.co.za